Upto TM to see if they can prove theyre up to it...
up to TM or UR?
with the tm500/600 there is an actual TM image, no cams, no emulators, just like with DMM receivers, and official crappy image that does nothing. ive yet to see a TM800 image like this
TM have created the hardware, some people were a bit worried about heat, TM responded, and the box now runs cold to touch
the latest image is the most stable one so far, showing that the actual hardware Is as good as people have been expecting. so for people to say the tm 800 is bad due to .....whatever, and slating technomate for it, i personally think is slating the wrong people
what people should be saying is that the software doesnt do ..... whatever, which is why i said about a sticky of stuff thet UR team is working on, or any of the 'other' 3 teams who are meant to be releasing images
last year, my local tesco filled their underground tanks wrong, and unleaded was coming out of the diesel pumps. tesco is the 3rd party, yet at first, all their customers blamed their cars when they started conking out
the car was fine, yet something put into it from a 3rd party didnt work as expected, at first, people blamed their car makers, untill it was discovered where the issue was
the receiver is fine, and a solid stable bit of kit, the 3rd party you introduce to it (UR) still needs working on, and this should be where 'issues' are directed
if i was anything to do with TM, id release a standard image to the public, that records and plays back, thats then their bit done. all the 'extras' are nothing to do with them
all the above is just my opinion