Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits

Darkstar said:
But sadly, probably true!!!!
Click to expand...

I wonder what odds the bookies would give you?:err:
You should check and if their good enough you could bet your life savings, house, husband,kids and dog on it, you would clean up.
Just remember it was you that thought of it.:ur the man:
 
emarald said:
Watch the first video, it's a must and adds real credibility to your argument.

:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

These are the kind of nuts you blindly follow



The Apollo Hoax
Click to expand...

I don't blindly follow anyone thank you. So you think that NASA release RAW uncensored pictures from every space mission without first checking that info?

If you do then that would be very foolish.

The live feed from the space shuttle missions that you can watch via Nasa TV. Do you think that is live?

Its not by the way.

Here are a few points that make me doubt the moon landing credibility.

1) They conveniently "deleted" the high quality slow-band Apollo tapes

2) This Mythbusters episode at 6 minutes... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23BIb_PMJ4M]YouTube - Prepare to be Busted - Mythbusters Debunked addendum[/ame]

Rather compelling!

3) Strange Apollo 17 pics of the rover... There are no tracks,seems to be staged!
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21512HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21513HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21515HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21516HR.jpg

4) When watching many of the high-res Apollo pictures, there is a line with sharp contrast in ground details and color in the distance, in a strait line across the picture. This is exactly what you would expect if they were on a set and the "walls" was a screen with moon painted on or projected onto. Stanley Kubrick used projection screen in his 1968 sci-fi 2001: A space Odyssey

I suggest you read this 1st Jay Weidner

Now for the NASA pictures,
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9102HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9117HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9118HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9119HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21518HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21520HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21522HR.jpg

If you read the above on the possible use of 'front screen projection', you find the images provided (FROM NASA) very convincing.Virtually every expansive landscape you look at from NASA archive pictures exhibits the tell tale traits. It's not just the details. It's ground composition, color, texture etc
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21520HR.jpg

5) Isn't it amazing that Nasa had nearly 100% succes rate with rockets and Lunar modules?
Compare with Russia's countless failures just to get a unmanned rover on moon. Nasa was little too perfect, they had no computers to run simulations on.

Anyway, there is lots more evidence. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind regarding all this, its just there seems (to me anyway) that there is evidence that refuse me to believe the moon landings (as portrayed) hook, line and sinker.
 
Darkstar said:
3) Strange Apollo 17 pics of the rover... There are no tracks,seems to be staged!
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21512HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21513HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21515HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21516HR.jpg
Click to expand...

Wtf is this, it looks like lid & container of one of those Rustlers microwave burgers :)

moon-debris.jpg
 
I see some people on here are honourary members of the 'Nasa Uncovered Truth Shame' alliance.
 
Darkstar said:
I don't blindly follow anyone thank you. So you think that NASA release RAW uncensored pictures from every space mission without first checking that info?

If you do then that would be very foolish.

The live feed from the space shuttle missions that you can watch via Nasa TV. Do you think that is live?

Its not by the way.

Here are a few points that make me doubt the moon landing credibility.

1) They conveniently "deleted" the high quality slow-band Apollo tapes

2) This Mythbusters episode at 6 minutes... YouTube - Prepare to be Busted - Mythbusters Debunked addendum

Rather compelling!

3) Strange Apollo 17 pics of the rover... There are no tracks,seems to be staged!
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21512HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21513HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21515HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21516HR.jpg

4) When watching many of the high-res Apollo pictures, there is a line with sharp contrast in ground details and color in the distance, in a strait line across the picture. This is exactly what you would expect if they were on a set and the "walls" was a screen with moon painted on or projected onto. Stanley Kubrick used projection screen in his 1968 sci-fi 2001: A space Odyssey

I suggest you read this 1st Jay Weidner

Now for the NASA pictures,
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9102HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9117HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9118HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9119HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21518HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21520HR.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21522HR.jpg

If you read the above on the possible use of 'front screen projection', you find the images provided (FROM NASA) very convincing.Virtually every expansive landscape you look at from NASA archive pictures exhibits the tell tale traits. It's not just the details. It's ground composition, color, texture etc
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21520HR.jpg

5) Isn't it amazing that Nasa had nearly 100% succes rate with rockets and Lunar modules?
Compare with Russia's countless failures just to get a unmanned rover on moon. Nasa was little too perfect, they had no computers to run simulations on.

Anyway, there is lots more evidence. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind regarding all this, its just there seems (to me anyway) that there is evidence that refuse me to believe the moon landings (as portrayed) hook, line and sinker.
Click to expand...

Waw,, a bet NASA are shitting themselves after that devastating post that dosen't prove anything.lol
However i suppose proof is a small thing to have when you have a good theory.
I hope you never have to attend jury juty.

I could argue most of those points but a just can't be arsed tbh.

So here are a couple of "facts" that you need to explain to make your theory work.
1--- Telemetry
2--- Lunar Laser Ranger:Kickassro: :Kickassro :Kickassro
 
NASA launched the TETR-A satellite just months before the first lunar mission. The proclaimed purpose was to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that the Houston ground crews (all those employees sitting behind computer screens at Mission Control) could "rehearse" the first moon landing. In other words, though NASA claimed that the satellite crashed shortly before the first lunar mission (a misinformation lie), its real purpose was to relay voice, fuel consumption, altitude, and telemetry data as if the transmissions were coming from an Apollo spacecraft as it neared the moon. Very few NASA employees knew the truth because they believed that the computer and television data they were receiving was the genuine article. Merely a hundred or so knew what was really going on; not tens of thousands as it might first appear.

Ba-boom!!!
 
Darkstar said:
... I suggest you read this 1st Jay Weidner.....

Isn't it amazing that Nasa had nearly 100% succes rate with rockets and Lunar modules?
Click to expand...

The original post this was edited down from contains the usual nonsense to be found on conspiracy websites, but I've picked out two points.

1. Jay Weidner. Read the Apollo Stuff by all means, but the other wacky stuff on his website is much more entertaining. Crop circles, Alchemy, The School of Sacred Mysteries, Sacred Sensuality, Shifting Dimensions. There are hours of endless fun to be had here!

2. NASA's nearly 100% success. More misinformation. NASA had many failures before they got things right. Luckily only three astronauts actually died (in the Apollo 1 launchpad fire), but Apollo 13 was a near miss.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13qeX98tAS8]YouTube - Early U.S. rocket and space launch failures and explosion[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLn0_ABKvxY]YouTube - NASA Failures[/ame]

(the second video is a clip from the film "The Right Stuff", but it features actual NASA footage.)
 
Darkstar said:
NASA launched the TETR-A satellite just months before the first lunar mission. The proclaimed purpose was to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that the Houston ground crews (all those employees sitting behind computer screens at Mission Control) could "rehearse" the first moon landing. In other words, though NASA claimed that the satellite crashed shortly before the first lunar mission (a misinformation lie), its real purpose was to relay voice, fuel consumption, altitude, and telemetry data as if the transmissions were coming from an Apollo spacecraft as it neared the moon. Very few NASA employees knew the truth because they believed that the computer and television data they were receiving was the genuine article. Merely a hundred or so knew what was really going on; not tens of thousands as it might first appear.

Ba-boom!!!
Click to expand...

Some words would be useful here mate, lets try and keep it simple..lol
There is a device with 3 panels on the moon surface which have to be set in an exact place to fire a light beam back to earth.
It measures the distance from the moon to earth.
Its called a "lunar laser ranger"
In a nutshell,,,, how did it get there???

Telemetry of the landings were recorded by the Soviet Unions latest intelligence-gathering and surveillance equipment right down to where Armstrong overshot the landing site..
Australia obviously recorded it as did Tidbinbilla radio telescope.

There were many others including our good old Patrick Moore....

If the Russians suspected foul play for a second,, im pretty sure we would have known about it.

Ever tried keeping a secret from your family or work mates??
Hard aint it...
Try keeping a secret within 400,000+ people who worked on the project.

The Moon theory is a load of bull.....:Kickassro
 
Darkstar said:
NASA launched the TETR-A satellite just months before the first lunar mission. The proclaimed purpose was to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that the Houston ground crews (all those employees sitting behind computer screens at Mission Control) could "rehearse" the first moon landing. In other words, though NASA claimed that the satellite crashed shortly before the first lunar mission (a misinformation lie), its real purpose was to relay voice, fuel consumption, altitude, and telemetry data as if the transmissions were coming from an Apollo spacecraft
Click to expand...

More misinformation I'm afraid.

Clavius: Technology - communications
 
jaffa said:
Would someone please tell me my last trip to specsavers was not an evil plot by specsavers to steal my money and sell me glasses which see things that are not there.

"are there tracks in the above link or should I go to a different optician"

I see them....I really do.
Click to expand...

Nice one Jaffa.
Tbh i didn't even bother to check m8 but i think your optician is safe.lol
;)
 
mozr said:
I see some people on here are honourary members of the 'Nasa Uncovered Truth Shame' alliance.
Click to expand...

I've decided to name you lot the Twat Pack. ;)

Tossers Without A Truth
 
Last edited:
IIRC didn't Armstrong hear god's voice when he first set foot on the moon? Why would he lie about that?
 
yeah he said 'no kfc today son its shut, due to the moon landing being on tv. it's live you know.'
 
Munkey said:
IIRC didn't Armstrong hear god's voice when he first set foot on the moon? Why would he lie about that?
Click to expand...

you're joking?..never heard that one before.

did he say which gods voice he heard?...


:Fish:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
    • Like
World News India's Chandrayaan-3 attempts first ever south pole Moon landing today (23/08)
Replies
3
Views
457
Oggiman
O
O
    • Haha
World News Russian lunar lander crashes into moon surface
Replies
1
Views
358
chookey
chookey
O
    • Like
World News NASA plans Armageddon-style deflection after experts name date asteroid could hit Earth
Replies
0
Views
270
Oggiman
O
trevortron
    • Like
Before you fly on a Boeing aircraft, especially a 737Max
Replies
0
Views
798
trevortron
trevortron
snapman
    • Like
Google Maps adds the International Space Station
Replies
0
Views
383
snapman
snapman
Back
Top