The question of existance, why anything exists (the Big Bang theory), has never been proven mate. There is not one scientist on the planet who can explain it, or even put forward a theory. The best they can do is label it 'The Big Bang'. What is the big bang? who made the big bang? what was there before the big bang?
Even Richard Dawkins stumbles on that one and states that our existance is probably down to a 'designer' - but the thing is, he has a problem with calling that designer, God!
No offence intended mate, but you have a really naive view on science. The industry is worth billions and billions of dolars mate, and where there is money like that to be made, there is corruption. Did you know scientists who have a view about creationism in the past have been kicked out of the scientific community and ostracised? Loyalty, unbiased opinions? You won't find a group of people more egostistical and who love the sounds of their own voices than scientists mate.
It's actually the job of science to prove absolutly that something isn't so rather than it is... Did you know that?
Our lot? lol... See, there science goes again, has to group everything and then slap a label on it. You have this stereotype in your head about anyone who has a belief in anything remotely paranormal, and you run with it. I love science mate, obviously I like it a lot more than you do! I think quantum physics is fasinating.
Crap? Seriously, your name calling is just pure frustration on your part not being able to articulate your views absolutly without there being any room for me or anyone else to debate back, loss of control mate, but that control isn't there becasue it doesn't exist... And that is why this very debate STILL rumbles on amongst some of the greatest scientists on the planet.
If either side was proven absolutly, there would be no debate... So you're just gonna have to live with that or live in your bubble where you are always right...