Firemouth
Inactive User
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2006
- Messages
- 2,512
- Reaction score
- 351
first i have heard of that rule, its a strange one, but maybe one that makes people think twice before buying booze infront of thier kids, in that respect its good, but the rule has too many flaws and isnt going to work properly.
This is very slightly off topic, but, I was amazed that parliment voted against raising the legal age of buying alcohol to 21, to me that would have helped a lot, theres far too many young folk who are maybe 14-15 but can pass easily as 18, but they wouldnt pass as being 21, that was a big mistake with parliment in my opinion, it was possibly voted negative just because of the stupid voting system in parliment, if one party says yes to one thing the others will say no just to spite them, i bet thats what it was, stupid bunch of people.
usa law is best, you dont only need to be 21 to buy booze, you also need to show id nomatter what age you are right up until you look about 40, thats a great law. (some states are more strict than others)
first off. its only in some, US states, you need to be 21 to buy beer or alcohol. same for ID's.
as the rule for alcohol? atm, is 18+. what makes you think upping it will help? its having little effect now. but well, kids are scum right? they need put in their place. no wonder kids get pi$$ed, look at the adults they have to look up to!
i feel the Tesco rule in dim. but there is little we can do, except, buy somewhere else. they can't force you to give ID. by the same token, you cant force them, to sell booze, to you either. mind you, if you have been stopped, as you leave, after you have paid. they would need to "prove" it was for an under age person. that can only be done in court.(as far as i am aware, only a cop, could take it from you) once you have paid, its yours period.