• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

bbc denies 9/11 conspiracy

Status
Not open for further replies.

english

Inactive User
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
5,571
Likes
99
#1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/7483700.stm

wot a crock!!

they didn't 'lose' the tapes they where 'put on the wrong shelf' ... that's a childish fib for hiding something if ever i heard one ...

as for getting the false info from reuters it says that They (reuters) new something !! they just sent it to the beeb too early !!

'cock-up rather than conspiracy' LOL

keep trying British Bullshit Corporation and i'll keep laughing.

rant over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Munkey

Inactive User
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
5,831
Likes
169
#2
The link works but the video does not play. It says that the content is not available.
 

meangreenie

Inactive User
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
742
Likes
21
#5
Yeh that 3rd tower that went down is the one the anti-conspiracy theorists like to not talk about.

It fairly obvious it was brought down deliberately :(
 

FUBAR69

Inactive User
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,360
Likes
33
#11
And the 3rd building contained all the files & evidence for the "Enron" case, kinda handy or what :banana:
 

Munkey

Inactive User
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
5,831
Likes
169
#12
Loose change has many holes in its claimed version of events and is mostly garbage.

Tower 7 falling over like that and being blamed on loose debris and fire from the Twin Towers does seem like a load of bollocks though.

Who to believe? Best to not give a crap IMHO.
 

FUBAR69

Inactive User
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,360
Likes
33
#13
Well there has only ever been 2 building with metal frames ever to collapse due to fire, and they were on the same day :err:

And what about the plane that flew into the Pentagon ?.... not as much as a screw was found of a plane, not even a feckin napkin !!!
 

nara

Who?
VIP Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
14,759
Likes
260
#14

english

Inactive User
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
5,571
Likes
99
#15
More conspiracy theory being quoted as fact! It's just not true.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6
i've seen banned footage of the pentagon being hit by a missile, it certainly wasn't a plane. could a plane smash thru to the centre of the (ridiculously reinforced) pentagon or a bunker buster? honestly now

anyone can 'debunk' any sound theory by using opposite theories, 'experts' and theatrical photos m8, as u well know ;) it's how they do it on the telly ..
 

nara

Who?
VIP Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
14,759
Likes
260
#18
I'm surprised at you Fubar m8. I thought you had more sense than to fall for this sort of baloney. :(
 

FUBAR69

Inactive User
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,360
Likes
33
#19
I'm surprised at you Fubar m8. I thought you had more sense than to fall for this sort of baloney. :(

Some say baloney some say bratwurst :banana:


Just out of curiosity though, the picture you posted of the pentagon after it was hit by the plane, I have seen pics and the building is completely destroyed for a large portion...... but in your pic it is 100% intact.....funny that :err:


Very handy though, those nicely placed plane parts just in front of a emergency scene......if I did not know better.................................lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.