Hi guys
Thanks for the updates !
Digi the tm-800 you got now, how good is the current software ?
How stable is cccam etc ?
What areas of the software isn't stable you think ?
Can we get pictures of the Spiderbox next to the TM800 ?
roud:
Cheers
ive only had a quick play with cccam, but it seems fine m8, mgcamd works perfectly. theres one or 2 bits of the software that i can force the box to crash with certain key presses, but this is not something that would be done in everyday use, remember, i try my best to kill a box, with the intention of restoring it in the easiest way possible
when i first got the receiver, i took it out of the box, and took it apart, put it all back together, and 45 mins later, it was a useless brick. now while this is what i enjoy doing, its at this point, when you realise that youre the only one with this box, and theres ZERO help out there, that you start to think 'oops, maybe i shouldnt try so hard to kill it' then you have to find a way to fix it, on your own, and since doinf this, but before releasing my guide, i was getting calls from testers via msn from the UK and europe who had done the same thing, but couldnt fix it
IMHO theres one or 2 little 'glitches' in the image, not bugs as such, but im not the one with the final say, its not my companies reputation on the line, so while its an honour for what i do to be recognised, at the end of it all, im just an everyday joe who has a few extra benefits
and i could take a photo, but, for what reason? i own both boxes, i have access to vast numbers of both boxes. to compare them wouldnt really be fair, due to the way they work,
it would be like comparing battery and diesel milk floats. one has more power under the hood, one gets from A-B faster, one may be able to carry more milk than the other, one is a LOT easier to drive, but no matter which one you choose as your supplier, you end up with the same milk (for those who dont get my warped mind, even i dont half the time lol, no matter which one, you still end up watching pictures)