Clone boxes destroyed by gemini

@Trackermut,

I am fully behind you and find it a laugh how some members think that DMM are ripping them off and even comparing DMM to large cooperations like Sony etc.

The Amount of Boxes that they sell is nowhere the amount Sony porduces so cost is higher and Tax etc is high in Germany anyway.

What they also do not understand and always bring the Microsoft example back in.

DMM Develop their Hardware (yeaj based on a Referenz design but still needs to be designed), They develop their Software, They support their resellers, they have cost for Software development etc so they have the right to stop something working that has been stolen from them

No excuse, if some far east factory suddenly starts copying Ipods 1:1 and even let's them run on Apple's Software incl Software updates via Apple and Apple would decide to stop that what are you going to say to that ?

Also with the 8000 they had to go DVI has HDMI put's all sorts of restrictions on to them especially by People like BskyB (Murdoch) with their supid Copy Protection etc.
 
So you want Dream to compete with clone prices clone boxes are made in china with no development costs no support costs and no warranty costs, how can they do this as far as i can remember original dreambox 500 cost 150 quid at the same time 130 for eurovox and 110 for starview one, how is that expensive when they came with a 2 year warranty and support from manufacture, yeah keep buying clone boxes and they will be no further developments.

Virus what virus this is a program written to work on there on product. would you complain if you flashed a starview with eurovox software and it did not work. they are protecting there interests and there future as stated dont agree but they are fighting for survival.


if you want to pay 60 quid for a clone and its bricked well thats your risk dont bleat at dream cause you bought a cheap knock off and they will not support it.

Next we will want Branson to broadcast for free because no one will support clone development.



Hi

i should not pronounce in this matter but i have told this somewhere and will also speak here.


Why do you think they are competing with clones ?

1- Are clones really clones ?
2- why are the original dreamboxes also being manufactured in china?


Yeah that's right do u think it is fair for companies like dreamultimedia and others go to china to extorque money from manufacturers in china,where employes get paid less £50 per month....

yes they cost of manufacturing a so called original dreambox is the same or cheaper then the production of clones.

In fact some of the manufacturers which in the past have produced dreambox for dreamultimedia realized the profit being made by dreamultimedia , so they decided also to go OEM version.


The HW from some clones is exactly the same as the orginal , just mac address change......

So now you wonder is fair for DM600 charge £200 for oficial if they only pay £55 for production from manufacturer????


P.S - DM500 was copied from DBOX1/2 in germany in fact some people say they copied the work from Nokia Dbox1/2 and then progressed their way.
This is being done now by the china man also they started by copying and now have progressed into OEM versions.......

Now you say that dm also invested alot of time and money in ?????? since when???? as all supported emus/imagens/plugins where developed 99% by private coders which are also in this hobby by money or fun..... so what has Dream really done througouth the years????


And yes currently Dreamultimedia is paying around $160 for productions of DM800 which is around £80-£90 a piece.... do u also think is fare for them to sell it at around £350 or maybe more ????
Who suffers in the end???? the chinaman which works up is arse to manufacture them so someone else can make the profit.
And also we the stupid mankind which pay that same amount of money..... i also know a few chinese clones which are in the market with 24months warranty. in fact i have one which has been up and running for over 24months with no problems.


The all theory of clones needs to be dramaticaly changed and why, because dreamultimedia only has exclusive rights for their brand... and not by the HWare components used in the box.

So for instance if i contact a manufacturer in china to produce a Envision 500 they in fact can manufacture with the same components from dm500 as long as the brand is not the same they are not comiting any ilegal act.
Why?
Because companies such as IBM and other which manufacture the components use by Dreambox also sell this same components to other companies.

Now let's say that someone independent creates a new firmware for envision box and use different mac address in envision boxes and firmware from drembox mac address , then some user buys envision and install gemini by mistake which have a timebomd on their latest firmware and ends up killing box as the mac address does not correspond for a legitimate mac address from a dreambox.

Who is responsible ??? why should other oem version brand which use same hw with different mac address should be classed as clones???? in fact 00:09:34 mac address should only be used in DM boxes and not oem versions otherwise they would be breaching dreambox mac address exclusive rights.

So who is responsible for damagin other OEM version boxes ? the owner ot the box which loaded firmware by mistake not knowing of the issue, but because image is also compatible it ended up fcuking box?

Perhaps if they Dreamultimedia dropped prices to a reasonable price like for instance DM800 as £170 people would buy the original item and not the counterfit item


And yes they still did not managed to have licence for HDMI in their boxes so they had to go for the DVI conectors
 
The whole reason Dream are failing is because they are being too greedy.They have a monopoly on linux boxes and charge extortionite prices.
How have they got a monopoly? Is something stopping other companies making them?

eg the new dream 800 should not cost more than 250 euro,which is very expensive anyway but no,dream charge 450 euro.
How did you calculate the €250?

These boxes are a different ball game to the likes of playstations that are often sold at loss, and have massive unit sales where the development cost is split over millions of units.

I acutallly think they are very cheap, I would compare them to similar electronic goods, low volume specialist equipment usually costs a fortune, and rightly so, if you understand the costs involved.


Its there own fault people are buying clones,I for one will not buy a real DMM product until they stop abusing their monopoly position and ripping off the consumers.
People are free to chose to be "ripped off" or not.

I work designing machines, on the mechanical side. One of my machines was copied in China. They copied our PCB blindly, including things it did not need. They copied all the housing and metal work exactly, again including features only there because of our own manufacturing limitations. The copied machines are illegal, they do not conform to electrical safety guidelines. They do not have our name on them, but when I first saw one I found it hard to tell from the real one, and I designed it!

What if they had genuinely made software that happened to kill the clones. Is it up to them to check any releases on any clones out there. If somebody looks for spares for my machine should I make sure it works on the illegal machine, in case thats what the customer has. Do Sony have to make sure firmware updates will not knock out Panasonic units, or chipped playstations?
 
Last edited:
Hi

i should not pronounce in this matter but i have told this somewhere and will also speak here.


Why do you think they are competing with clones ?

1- Are clones really clones ?
2- why are the original dreamboxes also being manufactured in china?


Yeah that's right do u think it is fair for companies like dreamultimedia and others go to china to extorque money from manufacturers in china,where employes get paid less £50 per month....

yes they cost of manufacturing a so called original dreambox is the same or cheaper then the production of clones.

In fact some of the manufacturers which in the past have produced dreambox for dreamultimedia realized the profit being made by dreamultimedia , so they decided also to go OEM version.


The HW from some clones is exactly the same as the orginal , just mac address change......

So now you wonder is fair for DM600 charge £200 for oficial if they only pay £55 for production from manufacturer????


P.S - DM500 was copied from DBOX1/2 in germany in fact some people say they copied the work from Nokia Dbox1/2 and then progressed their way.
This is being done now by the china man also they started by copying and now have progressed into OEM versions.......

Now you say that dm also invested alot of time and money in ?????? since when???? as all supported emus/imagens/plugins where developed 99% by private coders which are also in this hobby by money or fun..... so what has Dream really done througouth the years????


And yes currently Dreamultimedia is paying around $160 for productions of DM800 which is around £80-£90 a piece.... do u also think is fare for them to sell it at around £350 or maybe more ????
Who suffers in the end???? the chinaman which works up is arse to manufacture them so someone else can make the profit.
And also we the stupid mankind which pay that same amount of money..... i also know a few chinese clones which are in the market with 24months warranty. in fact i have one which has been up and running for over 24months with no problems.


The all theory of clones needs to be dramaticaly changed and why, because dreamultimedia only has exclusive rights for their brand... and not by the HWare components used in the box.

So for instance if i contact a manufacturer in china to produce a Envision 500 they in fact can manufacture with the same components from dm500 as long as the brand is not the same they are not comiting any ilegal act.
Why?
Because companies such as IBM and other which manufacture the components use by Dreambox also sell this same components to other companies.

Now let's say that someone independent creates a new firmware for envision box and use different mac address in envision boxes and firmware from drembox mac address , then some user buys envision and install gemini by mistake which have a timebomd on their latest firmware and ends up killing box as the mac address does not correspond for a legitimate mac address from a dreambox.

Who is responsible ??? why should other oem version brand which use same hw with different mac address should be classed as clones???? in fact 00:09:34 mac address should only be used in DM boxes and not oem versions otherwise they would be breaching dreambox mac address exclusive rights.

So who is responsible for damagin other OEM version boxes ? the owner ot the box which loaded firmware by mistake not knowing of the issue, but because image is also compatible it ended up fcuking box?

Perhaps if they Dreamultimedia dropped prices to a reasonable price like for instance DM800 as £170 people would buy the original item and not the counterfit item

Who are working on firmware for DMM ,and who was the main maintainer of the CVS tuxbox ..? compare well the name..
Dream has the idea to make more powerfull receiver and too take the old team to make it, do you think they work for free ??

So for instance if i contact a manufacturer in china to produce a Envision 500 they in fact can manufacture with the same components from dm500 as long as the brand is not the same they are not comiting any ilegal act.
Why?
Because companies such as IBM and other which manufacture the components use by Dreambox also sell this same components to other companies.
This just simply isnt true,,,,, If they produced the Envision with the same components as the dm500 with there own design, then why are they relying on the dream Head.ko driver file?
Answer: 1) they dont spend money on development to make there own bootloader!!! 2) they are using a copyrighted and patented bootloader, made and developed by DREAM soooo you explain why there doing nothing wrong..
So dreamup is not used to flash receiver?, Head.ko is not used? , and bootloader shipped with the receiver is not the property of DMM.? but they can use the hardware which they class as there own? nah sorry dont buy it.

On the otherhand,, If they had to make a tuxbox reciever,, but DID give a dam about development then they would be like companys like Dgstation or Itgate and have genuine non dreambox-clone enigma boxes which run on there own bootloaders, own firmwares, yet have the enigma feel.

End of the day, I know its not the users and customers fault,, BUT there has to be something done,, and with , no offence ment to anyone on here, there are many 'Gurus, mods and all types of member' on here actually recomending people to buy a clone,, but now there getting killed its the manufactors fault?

in conclusion no ifs or buts,, Clone is Clone, and shouldnt have the right to use dreams software/drivers and bootloaders.

edited-
1- Are clones really clones ?
2- why are the original dreamboxes also being manufactured in china?

First question answers itself,, are clones really clones,, of course they are hence why you can pick one up for £60 when the originals were RRP £150,, ( again, the RRP should have no relavance to wheather its ok for them to kill clones or not )
Second question you again answered yourself, Yes there made in china, and about 200 yards from the main clone factory,,, but this is common practice in that type of industry, obviously cheaper for them to do that,,, but again, this isnt just dream ,, any larger company would Obviously go the cheapest route to production line, the main thing being theres is genuine.
 
Last edited:
dream dont seem to take the same reaction when their products are used to rip off program providers',they have done this in the past with the magic module and any product that are associated with shoud be regarded with caution when used with other products.
it doesnt matter what german law does or says it is irrelevant here,they are a business that makes a "large" profit on its products,duolabs have done the same thing in the past and manufacturers of goods associated with pirating of services seen to think they have a right to do this.and get away with it.
 
How have they got a monopoly? Is something stopping other companies making them?


How did you calculate the €250?

These boxes are a different ball game to the likes of playstations that are often sold at loss, and have massive unit sales where the development cost is split over millions of units.

I acutallly think they are very cheap, I would compare them to similar electronic goods, low volume specialist equipment usually costs a fortune, and rightly so, if you understand the costs involved.



People are free to chose to be "ripped off" or not.

I work designing machines, on the mechanical side. One of my machines was copied in China. They copied our PCB blindly, including things it did not need. They copied all the housing and metal work exactly, again including features only there because of our own manufacturing limitations. The copied machines are illegal, they do not conform to electrical safety guidelines. They do not have our name on them, but when I first saw one I found it hard to tell from the real one, and I designed it!

What if they had genuinely made software that happened to kill the clones. Is it up to them to check any releases on any clones out there. If somebody looks for spares for my machine should I make sure it works on the illegal machine, in case thats what the customer has. Do Sony have to make sure firmware updates will not knock out Panasonic units, or chipped playstations?

I caluculated 250 because it it quite obvious they are making them for nothing in china and even charging 250 are making well over 100% profit.

I agree with everyting calhordas said,redhound aswell.
 
So DMM have hit back at clones through their Gemini development team.

It's having limited effect as news has circulated, and everyone in the know is swerving their images.

And this isn't just peeps who know they have clones, it's peeps who don't know what the hell they've got, original or otherwise.

So their images will have a very limited audience.
I'd like to be a developer on that team - nothing like job satisfaction after a big release!

And if you're unlucky enough to get your clone bombed, and JTAG recovery doesn't work?
Well, at this stage I think most would be loathed to fork out £150 to DMM for an original box, them having just screwed your other one.
So, you'll either give up, or buy another clone and use a different image.

Again DMM lose out.

Other developers will continue to improve and compile images using the old drivers, so DMM are quite literally out of the picture as far this particular model is concerned.

And what's to say DMM/Gemini won't do exactly the same with images they develop for other models.
I'm 99% sure my 7025 is original as I bought it from an authorised distributor, but just in case it isn't, i'm sure as hell not going to run the risk of loading a new gemini release on it.

And let's face it, if the disastrous marketing campaign for the 800/8000 is anything to go by, you wouldn't trust them to accurately check what came out of their factory and what rolled out of China.

Most companies work hard to positively entangle with their customers.
DMM's behaviour has only served to twist customers minds with mistrust and confusion.

Clone bombing, in my opinion, was very shortsighted and has further damaged an ailing reputation.
 
@Calhodas and others,

please try to get your facts right before you post anything.

The Dbox2 Development in Germany was started by a few very clever guys. It's all open Source and everything is freely available.

Some of these Coders then joined DMM and used their knowledge of the technology to develop the Dream Boxes.

Ghost is one of the original Enigma Coders and he developed Enigma 2.

The clones that you all defend are not OEM, OEM is only possible if the original Manufacturer allows someone to sell them under a different label.

These Boxes are copied 1:1 and even include the crappy Network so this proves the Boxes are 100% copy of the original Development.

I also disagree with the Argument that a chinese laborer only earns x amount of money a day/week as he only pays x amount of rent and cost of living.

You are in no position to calculate your phantasie prices on how much DMM can manufacture the boxes for and how much they can or should sell them.

Every Company has the right to choose the price for a product especially if they are a share holding company.

Also the Argument that Dream sells knowingly illegal products. Again get your cats right, not every TV Viewer is a criminal.

Why for example should I use BskyB's crappy technology to make me sick when I watch TV if I can buy a Prodo
uct not from a monopolist.
The usage of Cam's isnt illegal but it is most likely against the Term and Conditions of your TV Provider.
You can use original Cards that you Pay a Subscription Fee for in some camd's but other Cards might need you tu run an EMU what again is illegal as EMU's use copyrighted Encryption Technology.

It's different for Cable in the UK were you should not connect any Non Virgin Technologie to their cable.

I would like to see a judges decission if you do not use an EMU etc and just watch free TV on a Cable subscription that you pay for with your Non-Virgin Cable Box. With Free TV I mean BBC 1 and 2 as you pay License Fee for this (Well some of us do)

Most other manufacturers like DGStation or others have some Cable Tuners or Terestial Tuners bust mostely they have Sat Tuners.

Talking about a monopoly like BskyB in the UK you Football Fans are quite happy for Sky to tell you what time you are allowed to actually watch the Game and not when it is on.

The arguments for BskyB doing this are the most redicules arguments I have ever heard.

Again,

if some chinese Company copy 1:1 Apples Ipod and then also use on their fakes the same Software as Apple and use the same Network Address (I know they only use USB but the fakers of the clones just use 1 range of DMM's Network Addresses) and then even let their FAKE 100% Copied Technologie use Apples Service to update the Software.

Apple would be fully in their right to stop these shameless abuse

What you all forget with your Arguments is that DMM doesn't actually destroy the fakes, all they do is delete their own Software that has been stolen. It's theirs and they are fully allowed to do so.

Its a Hardware and Software Theft in this case !!!

The rest of the Software or at least the one that has been used from the OpenSources Comunity is freely available.

The Fake boxes can be recoverd with the usage of a Jtag but that means that 95% of all users that only come here to leech free TV and Information and then bugger off back again will struggle with this.

That includes the Traders that now are in a bit of trouble as everybody will come back to them as everybody thinks it is their god given right to have free TV and steel from Virgin.

Again, I have not got cable and I pay 49£ for my Sky Subscription a month and I ust use my Sat Box to watch German TV.

EDIT: 20.04.2008 20:57

HDMI was not possible as people like BSlyB are more powerfull than many of you think. They try every trick in the book to stop you guys @ home to get any chance to get their 100% digital Signal in any other way , shape or form and therefore put pressure even on IBM who manufacture the DVB Chip Technologie. I know this from a Sat Manufacturer in Korea !!

So DMM had to got the DVI Way !!!
 
Last edited:
I don't think DMM will be a company that can develop very well and very long. starview, eurovox dbox producer as well. Think about their customers, mainly use to rip off the tv service provider. Without this I think only 1 in 1000 will buy one. It is not right : ) (sorry I am one of them...) but I believe one day all these companies will be out cause they are not doing the right bussiness. especially the broadcast techniques are developed or law are enforce more strickly.

Well, anyway, let's enjoy today if we still can.
 
I don't think DMM will be a company that can develop very well and very long. starview, eurovox dbox producer as well. Think about their customers, mainly use to rip off the tv service provider. Without this I think only 1 in 1000 will buy one. It is not right : ) (sorry I am one of them...) but I believe one day all these companies will be out cause they are not doing the right bussiness. especially the broadcast techniques are developed or law are enforce more strickly.

Well, anyway, let's enjoy today if we still can.

Hello ? Wakeup time !!

England is no longer the center of the world ! There are other counrtys over in the Old Europe were Sat & Cable TV is not monopolized and therefore legimit Customers buy Receivers to actually watch FTA (FreeToAir) TV of their countrys equilent to BBC here in the UK.

Many PrivateTV Stations are Free via Sat too

So just because it seems like the nations favorite sport to steel or get something for free or cheaper there are other countrys out there in europe or the rest of the world were someone actually pays for a Product without using it for something illegal (I know it must come as a suprise for many of you!!!).

And isnt't the Eurovox also a clone of the DMM Hardware just in another box ?
 
I don't think DMM will be a company that can develop very well and very long. starview, eurovox dbox producer as well. Think about their customers, mainly use to rip off the tv service provider. Without this I think only 1 in 1000 will buy one. It is not right : ) (sorry I am one of them...) but I believe one day all these companies will be out cause they are not doing the right bussiness. especially the broadcast techniques are developed or law are enforce more strickly.

Well, anyway, let's enjoy today if we still can.

You are right. They seem to have an 'in it for the minute' philosophy.
To sustain as a business they will need to develop their strategy / re-create themselves to meet customer demand.
The napsters of this world moved on.
 
England is no longer the center of the world

Ha! Ha! Ha! that's fresh coming from a German,,,,,,,"tomorrow belongs to me"

ps if u want a go at the english center is spelt centre
 
Last edited:
Question 1. Why is the microsoft analogy stupid? Are we not after all talking about intellectual copyright theft, not hardware?

Question 2. Why is BskyB's copyright protection stupid, when DMM's is not?
 
Ha! Ha! Ha! that's fresh coming from a German,,,,,,,"tomorrow belongs to me"

ps if u want a go at the english center is spelt centre

English is my 2nd language ...what is yours ?
 
Question 1. Why is the microsoft analogy stupid? Are we not after all talking about intellectual copyright theft, not hardware?

Question 2. Why is BskyB's copyright protection stupid, when DMM's is not?


1: DMM Develops the Hardware and the software and both is copied/stolen by the Clone manufaturers.
2: I am not talking about copy protection, BskyB has a monolpoly in the UK and tries to enlarge this into the rest of europe etc.

I am not talking about stealing Sky TV, I am talking about a legal way to watch the TV Programs I do pay for with the Hardware I want to use and not the Hardware that I have to use
 
Do you have a statistic how many percentage of this type of customers are ? I bet if you do a survey that's DMM's wake up time.

Hello ? Wakeup time !!

England is no longer the center of the world ! There are other counrtys over in the Old Europe were Sat & Cable TV is not monopolized and therefore legimit Customers buy Receivers to actually watch FTA (FreeToAir) TV of their countrys equilent to BBC here in the UK.

Many PrivateTV Stations are Free via Sat too

So just because it seems like the nations favorite sport to steel or get something for free or cheaper there are other countrys out there in europe or the rest of the world were someone actually pays for a Product without using it for something illegal (I know it must come as a suprise for many of you!!!).

And isnt't the Eurovox also a clone of the DMM Hardware just in another box ?
 
Do you have a statistic how many percentage of this type of customers are ? I bet if you do a survey that's DMM's wake up time.

Mate no way,, I am from UK, and the UK market although fairly large, is NOTHING on world wide sales.
Comments were spot on pt-1
 
worldwidely, why there are so many forum discussing on how to rip off sat. or cable broadcasting in other language? well, maybe they are discussing virgin/sky uk

Mate no way,, I am from UK, and the UK market although fairly large, is NOTHING on world wide sales.
Comments were spot on pt-1
 
Back
Top