London Bridge Incident

Status
Not open for further replies.
countryboy said:
easy to say aslong as it's not one of your own being shot . The shoot to kill policy
Never worked before and it won't work now . All it does is feed the propaganda machine and help recruit new blood
Click to expand...

"my own" dont drive down city streets and cut 20 year old girls throats...

shoot to kill works for me
 
countryboy said:
Your being a little cheeky there mate . You know fine well I was talking about the civilian that was shot and you said there is always casualties in war I was talking about that .
Click to expand...

i had no idea you were talking about the civillian that was shot...
 
buzzer said:
i had no idea you were talking about the civillian that was shot...
Click to expand...
Well who did you think I ment by one of your own?... People always say people are injured in war . Well see if your killed by a stray police bullet or killed by a mad man with a knife the end result is still the same your dead . Take them prisoner if you can . You get more information from a live man than a dead one
 
countryboy said:
Your being a little cheeky there mate . You know fine well I was talking about the civilian that was shot and you said there is always casualties in war I was talking about that .
Click to expand...

This might sound bad but I would rather the risk of collateral damage if it saved more people being randomly slaughtered. Also just a thought the person caught in the crossfire must have been close to the terrorist. If the police hadn't shot him or them then the innocent may well have been the next victim. So in a perverse way it may have saved their life. Hypothetical I know but not inconceivable
 
countryboy said:
Well who did you think I ment by one of your own?... People always say people are injured in war . Well see if your killed by a stray police bullet or killed by a mad man with a knife the end result is still the same your dead . Take them prisoner if you can . You get more information from a live man than a dead one
Click to expand...

I thought you mean't a close family member.
hence the hurt if they got injured or killed accidently.

what did you think i meant?
 
One civilian accidently shot by police but is not in a serious condition

To be honest a small price to pay if you weigh up how many people the police must of saved by responding and killing the scum within 8 minutes

Honestly I don't know if the injured civilian has said anything yet, but if it was me that had been accidently shot by the police under those circumstances I would praise their bravery, remember the police thought at that time they were facing suicide bombers with explosive vests on

Don't get many chances to say this but I am proud of our police force
 
countryboy said:
Well who did you think I ment by one of your own?... People always say people are injured in war . Well see if your killed by a stray police bullet or killed by a mad man with a knife the end result is still the same your dead . Take them prisoner if you can . You get more information from a live man than a dead one
Click to expand...


Don't forget they had fake bomb vests on so it had to be shoot to kill

- - - Updated - - -

countryboy said:
Even if it was one of your kids that was "collateral damage" because it is someone daughter ,son ,mum or dad
Click to expand...


See my edit mate .
And so were the 7 killed :(
 
countryboy said:
Even if it was one of your kids that was "collateral damage" because it is someone daughter ,son ,mum or dad
Click to expand...
So you would of let the 3 cowards carry on marauding through the streets killing innocent men and women ?
 
IANB said:
Don't forget they had fake bomb vests on so it had to be shoot to kill
Click to expand...
Mate I have no doubt it was the correct thing to do this time , but I don't want to see the shoot to kill policy brought in . Mistakes get made unarmed people are killed then they have to cover their backs . Every situation should be taken as it's found not just right lad let's shoot these feckers
 
countryboy said:
Your being a little cheeky there mate . You know fine well I was talking about the civilian that was shot and you said there is always casualties in war I was talking about that .
Click to expand...

apologies @countryboy i misread your posts..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
countryboy said:
Mate I have no doubt it was the correct thing to do this time , but I don't want to see the shoot to kill policy brought in . Mistakes get made unarmed people are killed then they have to cover their backs . Every situation should be taken as it's found not just right lad let's shoot these feckers
Click to expand...

Suppose we could just spend millions of tax payers money jailing them for life like we have to do with the 2 scum f ucks that murdered Lee Rigby. I would have preferred to see these two killed by armed police also
 
countryboy said:
Take them prisoner if you can . You get more information from a live man than a dead one
Click to expand...

Oh how nice, we keep the tossers alive only for some future government to show them clemency and humanity and let them free, who knows with "immunity from prosecution letters".
While they are in prison they will make full use of their "human rights" bringing constant court cases and costing the taxpayer untold millions of £, and they'll have the opportunity to radicalise others.

If they respected everyone else's human rights there would be 7 people tucking into their evening meal tonight. The only good terrorist is a dead one.
 
IANB said:
Suppose we could just spend millions of tax payers money jailing them for life like we have to do with the 2 scum f ucks that murdered Lee Rigby. I would have preferred to see these two killed by armed police also
Click to expand...
You you be willing to pull the trigger and take a life . Might not be as easy as you think it could be .
 
Fangface said:
Oh how nice, we keep the tossers alive only for some future government to show them clemency and humanity and let them free, who knows with "immunity from prosecution letters".
While they are in prison they will make full use of their "human rights" bringing constant court cases and costing the taxpayer untold millions of £, and they'll have the opportunity to radicalise others.

If they respected everyone else's human rights there would be 7 people tucking into their evening meal tonight. The only good terrorist is a dead one.
Click to expand...

^^^^^^^^^ Well said that man ^^^^^^^^
 
countryboy said:
You you be willing to pull the trigger and take a life . Might not be as easy as you think it could be .
Click to expand...

Absolutely mate if it was my job and against terrorist scum. And I reckon I would sleep well at night
 
shoot to kill should always be the policy.

if a situation is serious enough to call on armed police, then they must has authority to shoot..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

alimac
    • Like
Tor launches WebTunnel Bridge
Replies
0
Views
145
alimac
alimac
alimac
    • Wow
    • Like
Ransomware gang did steal residents' confidential data, UK city council admits
Replies
0
Views
61
alimac
alimac
O
    • Like
Musician Eric Carmen dies aged 74
Replies
2
Views
199
spud1966
spud1966
O
    • Like
BBCiPlayer app for PC blocked from 08/04
Replies
0
Views
99
Oggiman
O
O
    • Like
Football: Sin Bin trial start date confirmed
Replies
0
Views
117
Oggiman
O
Back
Top