- Joined
- Aug 29, 2001
- Messages
- 41,825
- Reaction score
- 12,523
A judge has refused to let a Muslim woman in a full-length burka enter a plea until she reveals her face.
The 21-year-old from Hackney, who is charged with intimidating a witness, said she could not remove the veil in front of men because of her religion.
Judge Peter Murphy said however, she could not stand trial in the veil, which only reveals her eyes, because her identity could not be confirmed.
The woman is due back at Blackfriars Crown Court on 12 September.
Judge Murphy said the principle of open justice overrode the woman's religious beliefs, warning that a different person could go into the dock pretending to be her if she did not show her face.
'Open justice'
He said: "It is necessary for this court to be satisfied that they can recognise the defendant.
"While I obviously respect the right to dress in any way she wishes, certainly while outside the court, the interests of justice are paramount.
"I can't, as a circuit judge, accept a plea from a person whose identity I am unable to ascertain."
The woman's barrister, Claire Burtwistle, told the court the woman was not prepared to lower her veil with men in the room and suggested a female police officer or prison guard could identify the defendant and confirm it to the court.
However, Judge Murphy rejected the proposal and said: "It seems to me to be quite fundamental that the court is sure who it is dealing with.
"In my court room, that's going to come first.
"There is the principle of open justice and it can't be subject to the religion of the defendant whether the principle is observed or not."
Judge Murphy adjourned the case for legal argument over whether the defendant should have to remove her veil.
When the woman returns to court she is expected to enter a not guilty plea.
BBC News - Hackney woman told to remove burka by crown court judge
The 21-year-old from Hackney, who is charged with intimidating a witness, said she could not remove the veil in front of men because of her religion.
Judge Peter Murphy said however, she could not stand trial in the veil, which only reveals her eyes, because her identity could not be confirmed.
The woman is due back at Blackfriars Crown Court on 12 September.
Judge Murphy said the principle of open justice overrode the woman's religious beliefs, warning that a different person could go into the dock pretending to be her if she did not show her face.
'Open justice'
He said: "It is necessary for this court to be satisfied that they can recognise the defendant.
"While I obviously respect the right to dress in any way she wishes, certainly while outside the court, the interests of justice are paramount.
"I can't, as a circuit judge, accept a plea from a person whose identity I am unable to ascertain."
The woman's barrister, Claire Burtwistle, told the court the woman was not prepared to lower her veil with men in the room and suggested a female police officer or prison guard could identify the defendant and confirm it to the court.
However, Judge Murphy rejected the proposal and said: "It seems to me to be quite fundamental that the court is sure who it is dealing with.
"In my court room, that's going to come first.
"There is the principle of open justice and it can't be subject to the religion of the defendant whether the principle is observed or not."
Judge Murphy adjourned the case for legal argument over whether the defendant should have to remove her veil.
When the woman returns to court she is expected to enter a not guilty plea.
BBC News - Hackney woman told to remove burka by crown court judge
Unfortunately I had to go to Manchester United's ground during the week to get a present for someone and the car park was full of these Muslims in burka's. Now they hadn't bought anything because they had no bags unless these burka's have convenient little pockets on the inside of them. They were all sat on benches and walls near the entrance. So my question is Were they just sunbathing?. You couldn't really tell if they were Men or Women?. They could have been terrorist and you would never know the difference. 
