M
Mark
Guest
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>
> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "dinky doo" wrote:
> >
> > > "King Queen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:15:08 +0100, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >In article <[email protected]>,
> > > > >[email protected] says...
> > > > >> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 11:30:08 +0100, Dave Fawthrop
> > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >You are ignoring the fact that Parliament voted for the war.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Only because:
> > > > >> 1) the majority in Parliament are as corrupt as he is
> > > > >> 2) he lied to us about extra evidence that we couldn't see as it
> was
> > > > >> classified.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >Of course it was classified, they knew full well what weapons Iraq
> had,
> > > > >on account of the fact we sold him them!!!
> > > >
> > > > Well who sold them the t72 tanks, and S.A.M.S , der? was it the
> Soviet
> > > Union?
> > > I can't remember anyone metioning Iraqui Challenger or Abraham Tanks,
> F14,
> > > 15 or Tornado jets.
> > > Or Iraqui ground forces using SLR's or SL80's.
> > >
> > > Get real for fukts sake
> > > Their whole armed forces were based on the Soviet model.
> > > Anyone with exprience of B.O.A.R. will tell you the same.
> >
> > They got a lot of weapons from the Soviet Union, 47% in 1989. They also
> > got a lot from France, 27% including Mirage and Super Etendard planes
> > and Exorcet missiles.
> >
> > The British and Americans mainly supplied them with the weapons of mass
> > destruction.
>
> BOLLOCKS!!!!
>
>
Seem to remember a company called Matrix Churchill a while back getting a
severe slap on the wrist.
Also seem to recall government ministers of the day being somewhat
involved in the same company at a boardroom level.
If your memory needs jogging further, does the 'Iraqi supergun affair'
ring any bells?
>
> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "dinky doo" wrote:
> >
> > > "King Queen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:15:08 +0100, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >In article <[email protected]>,
> > > > >[email protected] says...
> > > > >> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 11:30:08 +0100, Dave Fawthrop
> > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >You are ignoring the fact that Parliament voted for the war.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Only because:
> > > > >> 1) the majority in Parliament are as corrupt as he is
> > > > >> 2) he lied to us about extra evidence that we couldn't see as it
> was
> > > > >> classified.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >Of course it was classified, they knew full well what weapons Iraq
> had,
> > > > >on account of the fact we sold him them!!!
> > > >
> > > > Well who sold them the t72 tanks, and S.A.M.S , der? was it the
> Soviet
> > > Union?
> > > I can't remember anyone metioning Iraqui Challenger or Abraham Tanks,
> F14,
> > > 15 or Tornado jets.
> > > Or Iraqui ground forces using SLR's or SL80's.
> > >
> > > Get real for fukts sake
> > > Their whole armed forces were based on the Soviet model.
> > > Anyone with exprience of B.O.A.R. will tell you the same.
> >
> > They got a lot of weapons from the Soviet Union, 47% in 1989. They also
> > got a lot from France, 27% including Mirage and Super Etendard planes
> > and Exorcet missiles.
> >
> > The British and Americans mainly supplied them with the weapons of mass
> > destruction.
>
> BOLLOCKS!!!!
>
>
Seem to remember a company called Matrix Churchill a while back getting a
severe slap on the wrist.
Also seem to recall government ministers of the day being somewhat
involved in the same company at a boardroom level.
If your memory needs jogging further, does the 'Iraqi supergun affair'
ring any bells?
