TM-Twin OE Price Announced

is there a price for one with a working image ?

Thats a contradition in terms m8 technomate have sold linux boxes without a working image for nearly 2 years now so nothing new with there new attempt, stay well away if I were you.
 
just a joke m8 am sure tm have leaned there lesson and box will be good
alex
 
I would have to see a decent working image before spening anymore money I havent got lol. ViX 2.3 is brilliant and I love my VU+ Duo but if this cant compete I would rather go with something thats tried and tested even if it does cost a bit more.
 
you will all be very supprised :) Im sure
 
Seems a few on here must be testing these receivers already or how would they know lol
With the new vu out in next few days then we will see how they match up price wise and support etc.

The Vu+ Ultimo is equipped with the latest chipset and many special features.
The Vu+ Ultimo supports 1 fixed satellite DVB-S/S2 tuner and 2 x pluggable tuners.

VU+ Ultimo
Chipset BCM7413
CPU (MHz) 400
RAM (expected) 512MB
FLASH 1GB
1 x Fixed Tuner, 2 x Pluggable Tuner
CI x2
Smart Card x2
USB 3 x USB 2.0 (one with 5V)
FAN
Internal HDD 2.5 ", 3.5"
Ethernet yes
USB Wireless -Optional




More info:

Front panelSmart Card slot 2
Common Interface 2
USB 2.0 1
Key 5 buttons (Standby, Vol +/-, Ch+/-)
Display Graphic type Large VFD (256×64) pixels

Rear panelTuner 3x pluggable single tuner (DVB-S2/C/T)
Connection TV 1x Scart socet
Video Output (composite) 1x Cinch socet
Video Output (component) YPbPr
Video/Audio Output (digital) 1x HDMI
Audio output (analogue) 2x Cinch socet
Audio output (digital) Standard optical (SPDIF)
USB 2.0 2
Ethernet 1
RS 232 1
FAN Automatic FAN control
e-SATA 1

PowerMain range 100-250/50-60 V/HZ
Power consumtion
(Max./typ. Operation/Stand-by) 60/25/1 W

RFRF range 47-864 MHZ
FEC, de-multiplexer DVB-S2 / DVB-C / DVB-T standard

VideoVideo resolution CCIR 601 (720×576 lines), 576p, 720p, 1080i
Video decoding MPEG-2, MPEG-4 compatible
Input data rate 2-45 Msymb/s
S/N >53dB

AudioDecoding AC3, MPEG-4 (AAC-HE), MPEG-1, Layer 1,2 and 3
Sampling rate 32/4.1/48KHz
S/N >65dB
LNBLNB supply (hor./vert.) 14/18, max. 400 V/mA
Control Signal 22KHz, ToneBurst, DiSEqC 1.0/1.1/1.2, USAL

GeneralDimensions (WxHxD) 380 x 60 x 290mm
Weight 3,0 Kg
Remote Universal Remote / QUERTY Keyboard
Vu_Ultimo_2.jpg
Ultimo%20remote.jpg
 
VU+ Ultimo chip is BCM7413 which is few years old ,
7413 has same speed as vu+duo.
Difference between 7413 and chip used in VU+ duo is without Demodulator(for tuners)
this means 7413 do not use on board tuner that is the only difference
ultimo on board memory is less then tmtwin also at £599 i think few times before buying it
it is over £300 more
expensive then tm twin and not as good
extra £300 for one extra tuner is pointless
just for big surprise from tm
 
Last edited:
why would they release a working image when the box isnt released ?
to be fair to TM they havent released the box for sale because the image isnt ready yet, it seems they have learnt from the mistake of TM800 ?

wait for the box to be released then Im sure some will find faults and have a moan :)
 
VU+ Ultimo chip is BCM7413 which is few years old ,
7413 has same speed as vu+duo.
Difference between 7413 and chip used in VU+ duo is without Demodulator(for tuners)
this means 7413 do not use on board tuner that is the only difference
ultimo on board memory is less then tmtwin also at £599 i think few times before buying it
it is over £300 more
expensive then tm twin and not as good
extra £300 for one extra tuner is pointless
just for big surprise from tm
Vu duo= 7335
 
undergroundres
your prediction = zero if you are not sure its pointless saying it march 2012 how do you know
manic01
your prediction =zero
each time i write a post
i am either related or working for tm or have 100% sahre
your 2nd post
get your fact right
bsm 7335 and 7413 is same except 7413 has not got on board tuner but 7335 has that's all
also 7413 is few years old is not new
few seconds in Google can read all about it
old chip at £599 wow i need new mortgage
 
Tbh it doesn't matter which box has which chip etc etc,it will always be how well they function,
So why dont we all stop slating this box and that box and just wait and see,

If people want to post specs or prices etc thats fine,providing they are correct,
and should not lead to them being slated for supplying said info,
 
Just for the record, nowhere on this site or elsewhere have i slagged off this new receiver from tm!

That wasn't a dig m8,I know you haven't,
I just get fed up with the constant bickering about this box is better then that box blah blah blah,
as I said we should ALL be able to post specs or price or even whether you are looking forward to the release of a box/image without somebody always jumping on it :)
 
Back
Top