Is there any benifit from going from CCcam to OScam
If I did change would it have any effect for my current peers?
If I did change would it have any effect for my current peers?
CCcam to OScam
- Thread starter DiamondGeezer
- Start date
What channels are they m8?
Think they are the pick TV channels
Wiz, is it easy to convert and can I still use CCcam for my client F: lines or would this have to be done in OScam
PickTV, PickTV+1 and Premier sports and I'm sure more will follow
Not a great loss but if it continues it would be
Its a bit more complicated m8 but still doable, you can use Oscam just to read the card and then pass it over to CCcam to share so once setup you just use c&f lines like normal
Its a bit more complicated m8 but still doable, you can use Oscam just to read the card and then pass it over to CCcam to share so once setup you just use c&f lines like normal
And would my peers still see the card as local or would it an an extra hop OScam - MyCCcam - PeerCCcam
Not sure on that one but it you could use the 256 trick using cccam 2.1.3 or less,
but if you have good peers and clients there not going to complain as it wont affect the card at all
Just gave it a whirl on my dm800 and failed missarabable
I'm using an external smargo and used these settings
oscam.conf
[global]
nice = -1
WaitForCards = 1
logfile = stdout
preferlocalcards = 1
saveinithistory = 1
[webif]
httpport = 8888
httpuser = admin
httppwd = admin
httpallowed = 192.168.1.100
# protocols
[newcamd]
key = 0102030405060708091011121314
port = 10000@0963:000000;10001@0963:000000
oscam.server
[reader]
label = slot1
protocol = internal
device = /dev/sci0
#boxid = yourboxid
blockemm-u = 0
blockemm-s = 0
blockemm-g = 1
blockemm-unknown = 1
emmcache = 1,3,2
group = 1
caid = 0963
oscam.user
[account]
user = test1
pwd = test2
monlevel = 0
uniq = 0
group = 1,2
au = 1
caid = 0963
do I need to add the user test1 into CCcam?
I'm using an external smargo and used these settings
oscam.conf
[global]
nice = -1
WaitForCards = 1
logfile = stdout
preferlocalcards = 1
saveinithistory = 1
[webif]
httpport = 8888
httpuser = admin
httppwd = admin
httpallowed = 192.168.1.100
# protocols
[newcamd]
key = 0102030405060708091011121314
port = 10000@0963:000000;10001@0963:000000
oscam.server
[reader]
label = slot1
protocol = internal
device = /dev/sci0
#boxid = yourboxid
blockemm-u = 0
blockemm-s = 0
blockemm-g = 1
blockemm-unknown = 1
emmcache = 1,3,2
group = 1
caid = 0963
oscam.user
[account]
user = test1
pwd = test2
monlevel = 0
uniq = 0
group = 1,2
au = 1
caid = 0963
do I need to add the user test1 into CCcam?
Good news is that I got this working in my dm800 with oscam 0618 and CCcam 2.13 but have problems getting it working with ubuntu and smargo
On ubuntu the version of oscam is 6020 and this is the error I'm getting
2011/11/13 12:51:30 0 s loadbalancer: can't read from file /tmp/.oscam/stat
2011/11/13 12:51:30 0 s waiting for local card init
2011/11/13 12:51:33 r reader skyuk initialized (device=/dev/ttyUSB0, detect=cd, mhz=500, cardmhz=500)
2011/11/13 12:51:33 0 skyuk card detected
2011/11/13 12:51:44 r Error activating card.
2011/11/13 12:51:54 r Error activating card.
2011/11/13 12:52:05 r Error activating card.
anyone got this working with ubuntu and a smargo?
oscam.conf
oscam.server
On ubuntu the version of oscam is 6020 and this is the error I'm getting
2011/11/13 12:51:30 0 s loadbalancer: can't read from file /tmp/.oscam/stat
2011/11/13 12:51:30 0 s waiting for local card init
2011/11/13 12:51:33 r reader skyuk initialized (device=/dev/ttyUSB0, detect=cd, mhz=500, cardmhz=500)
2011/11/13 12:51:33 0 skyuk card detected
2011/11/13 12:51:44 r Error activating card.
2011/11/13 12:51:54 r Error activating card.
2011/11/13 12:52:05 r Error activating card.
anyone got this working with ubuntu and a smargo?
oscam.conf
oscam.server
here you mate, also can't get it working for CCcam
As I say CCcam / OScam with a smargo in the DM800 all work fine
from dmesg could this be an issue
[ 7.148529] ftdi_sio ttyUSB0: Unable to read latency timer: -32
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.From oscam
From CCcam
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.From CCcam
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.
hi wiz can you till me pls what the 256 trick is for and may be you can put me rite here or has it to do with the 256 trick im trying to get my set up to au but not had any luck at the mo ive got some new configs from mark but still waitting for the card to au with only 11 days to go now what got me thinking was i reed a post saying cccam 2.13 will not au so y do all the images have oscam and cccam 2.13 not 2.14 or above cheers tony
The 256 trick just allows your card to show as a local instead of hop1 m8,but it was only do able on CCcam versions 2.1.3 and below
tried that earlier but still no luck, also tried on different hardware
Can't work it out, smargo and card work fine with my DM800 but getting it working on linux is a different ball game.
heres my current setup
Ubuntu
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.lsusb
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.oscam.conf
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.oscam.server
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.Smargo Settings
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.start oscam - oscam -d -c /usr/local/etc
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.oscam then dies with this settings so I change back to
protocol = mouse
device = /dev/ttyUSB0
but /dev/ttyUSB0 has dropped from the system so I have to reboot
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.after reboot
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.start oscam -
Code:
You don't have permission to view the code content. Log in or register now.I'm off for a pint so hopefully by the time I get back someoone here will have worked out where i'm going wrong
roud:
