F
fred
Guest
On Wednesday, in article
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Dave Fawthrop" wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:30:13 +0100, "Rob Overfield"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> |
> | "Dave Fawthrop" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> | news:[email protected]...
> | > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:35:07 +0100, [email protected] (fred) wrote:
> | >
> | > | On Wednesday, in article
> | > | <[email protected]>
> | > | [email protected] "Dave Fawthrop" wrote:
>
> | > | Under the Geneva Convention, as occupying powers, it was illegal for us
> | > | to make constitutional changes in Iraq.
> | >
> | > You Want Sadam and the Baath party back in power
> | > |
> | >
> |
> | Dave, an amazingly crass conclusion taken from insufficient information.
> | What has your last statement got to do with it?
>
> OK in words of two sylables
> | > | Under the Geneva Convention, as occupying powers, it was illegal for us
> | > | to make constitutional changes in Iraq.
>
> Sadam and the Baath Party were in power and *were* the constiution there
> was no democracy, and anyone who even looked like a danger to Sadam was
> murdered, in all about 30,000 per year.
>
> If one argues that constitutional changes can not be made, one is arguing
> that Sadam and the Baathists should still be in power.
>
> Therefore
> | > You [fred] Want Sadam and the Baath party back in power
>
> | No matter what he was doing,
> | inside in his own country, within limits, has little to do with the rest of
> | the outside world.
>
> The United Nations should sit back ignore genocide. Hmmm
>
--
ô
õçîd
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Dave Fawthrop" wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:30:13 +0100, "Rob Overfield"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> |
> | "Dave Fawthrop" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> | news:[email protected]...
> | > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:35:07 +0100, [email protected] (fred) wrote:
> | >
> | > | On Wednesday, in article
> | > | <[email protected]>
> | > | [email protected] "Dave Fawthrop" wrote:
>
> | > | Under the Geneva Convention, as occupying powers, it was illegal for us
> | > | to make constitutional changes in Iraq.
> | >
> | > You Want Sadam and the Baath party back in power
> | > |
> | >
> |
> | Dave, an amazingly crass conclusion taken from insufficient information.
> | What has your last statement got to do with it?
>
> OK in words of two sylables
> | > | Under the Geneva Convention, as occupying powers, it was illegal for us
> | > | to make constitutional changes in Iraq.
>
> Sadam and the Baath Party were in power and *were* the constiution there
> was no democracy, and anyone who even looked like a danger to Sadam was
> murdered, in all about 30,000 per year.
>
> If one argues that constitutional changes can not be made, one is arguing
> that Sadam and the Baathists should still be in power.
>
> Therefore
> | > You [fred] Want Sadam and the Baath party back in power
>
> | No matter what he was doing,
> | inside in his own country, within limits, has little to do with the rest of
> | the outside world.
>
> The United Nations should sit back ignore genocide. Hmmm
>
--
ô
õçîd