On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:07 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>>
>> {R}
>
>Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
>out?
Not likely. Fred and Richard are the owners of this group.
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
>> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
>> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been
>> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
>> 7374
>> >
>> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
>> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
>> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
>> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>> >
>> > --
>> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
>> objectionable.
>
>7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
>were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
>servers, not because it was objectionable.
>
>If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
>replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
>and try to prevent it from happening again.
>
>And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
>looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
It's not a very good modbot if it's losing articles :-(
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:05 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>
>BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:07 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>>
>> {R}
>
>Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
>out?
Not likely. Fred and Richard are the owners of this group.
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
>> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
>> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been
>> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
>> 7374
>> >
>> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
>> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
>> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
>> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>> >
>> > --
>> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
>> objectionable.
>
>7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
>were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
>servers, not because it was objectionable.
>
>If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
>replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
>and try to prevent it from happening again.
>
>And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
>looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
It's not a very good modbot if it's losing articles :-(
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:05 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>
>BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:07 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>>
>> {R}
>
>Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
>out?
Not likely. Fred and Richard are the owners of this group.
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
>> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
>> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been
>> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
>> 7374
>> >
>> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
>> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
>> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
>> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>> >
>> > --
>> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
>> objectionable.
>
>7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
>were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
>servers, not because it was objectionable.
>
>If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
>replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
>and try to prevent it from happening again.
>
>And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
>looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
It's not a very good modbot if it's losing articles :-(
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:05 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>
>BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:07 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>>
>> {R}
>
>Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
>out?
Not likely. Fred and Richard are the owners of this group.
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
>> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
>> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been
>> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
>> 7374
>> >
>> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
>> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
>> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
>> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>> >
>> > --
>> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
>> objectionable.
>
>7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
>were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
>servers, not because it was objectionable.
>
>If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
>replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
>and try to prevent it from happening again.
>
>And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
>looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
It's not a very good modbot if it's losing articles :-(
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:05 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>
>BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:07 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>>
>> {R}
>
>Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
>out?
Not likely. Fred and Richard are the owners of this group.
..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
>> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
>> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been
>> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
>> 7374
>> >
>> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
>> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
>> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
>> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>> >
>> > --
>> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
>> objectionable.
>
>7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
>were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
>servers, not because it was objectionable.
>
>If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
>replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
>and try to prevent it from happening again.
>
>And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
>looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
It's not a very good modbot if it's losing articles :-(
..
"AlexB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> >> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> >> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them
has
> >> been
> >> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
missposted.
> >> 7374
> >> >
> >> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying
to
> >> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the
demon or
> >> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled
by the
> >> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still
not
> >> objectionable.
> >
> >7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
> >were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
> >servers, not because it was objectionable.
> >
No problem then
"{R}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000,
> [email protected] (fred) wrote:
> }On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> } [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> }> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> }> news:[email protected]...
> }> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> }> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> }> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them
has
> }> > > been seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> }> > > missposted. 7374
> }> >
> }> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying
to
> }> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the
demon or
> }> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled
by the
> }> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> }> >
> }> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still
not
> }> objectionable.
> }
> }7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
> }were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
> }servers, not because it was objectionable.
> }
> }If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
> }replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
> }and try to prevent it from happening again.
> }
> }And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
> }looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
>
> This is the offending post as you can see it is only on alt.net
>
> |Xref: news uk.local.yorkshire.moderated:2072
> |Path:
cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.usenetserver.com!border1.nntp.sjc.gi
ganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.karoo.co.uk!n
ews.karoo.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
> |NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:11:33 -0600
> |From: "Rob Overfield" <[email protected]>
> |Newsgroups: uk.local.yorkshire.moderated
> |Subject: Yooo-hoooo!!!
> |Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:10:13 -0000
> |X-Priority: 3
> |X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> |X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> |X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> |Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> |Lines: 12
> |NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.249.171.93
> |X-Trace:
sv3-wimtvCcZnz7uYWInCVkeBFedNtnthzb5ZlgUnRyJsxb6S77dBZzsLXz6H7CotUQtQ3FY3R/2
pgR7Zzk!6sq5OCbXxx4nWYaxTr9gkNRnzmqeyeqOJlNYHUIBQjoX0xsG6tDUU8cuI46pJ4fpiJJS
mcSfZ3vQ
> |X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> |X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> |X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> |X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
> |X-Postfilter: 1.1
> |
> |Well hello everyone. Seems like we finally reached civilsation here...
> |
> |--
> |Rob
> |
> |Help me build up my army in Kings of Chaos, a roleplaying game.
> |and click on the link below!
> |http://www.kingsofchaos.com/recruit.php?uniqid=m3esci84
>
> There is one more posted from karoo.kcom.com that was not moderated.
>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
> I would look as if karoo.co.uk have added it, but not made it moderated
> this is one for the moderators to chase up.
>
> Bye
>
> {R}
Oi Ashton get a life, there's a great big world out there try joining
it!
"AlexB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> >> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> >> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them
has
> >> been
> >> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
missposted.
> >> 7374
> >> >
> >> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying
to
> >> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the
demon or
> >> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled
by the
> >> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still
not
> >> objectionable.
> >
> >7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
> >were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
> >servers, not because it was objectionable.
> >
No problem then
"{R}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000,
> [email protected] (fred) wrote:
> }On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> } [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> }> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> }> news:[email protected]...
> }> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> }> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> }> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them
has
> }> > > been seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> }> > > missposted. 7374
> }> >
> }> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying
to
> }> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the
demon or
> }> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled
by the
> }> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> }> >
> }> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still
not
> }> objectionable.
> }
> }7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
> }were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
> }servers, not because it was objectionable.
> }
> }If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
> }replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
> }and try to prevent it from happening again.
> }
> }And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
> }looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
>
> This is the offending post as you can see it is only on alt.net
>
> |Xref: news uk.local.yorkshire.moderated:2072
> |Path:
cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.usenetserver.com!border1.nntp.sjc.gi
ganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.karoo.co.uk!n
ews.karoo.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
> |NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:11:33 -0600
> |From: "Rob Overfield" <[email protected]>
> |Newsgroups: uk.local.yorkshire.moderated
> |Subject: Yooo-hoooo!!!
> |Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:10:13 -0000
> |X-Priority: 3
> |X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> |X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> |X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> |Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> |Lines: 12
> |NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.249.171.93
> |X-Trace:
sv3-wimtvCcZnz7uYWInCVkeBFedNtnthzb5ZlgUnRyJsxb6S77dBZzsLXz6H7CotUQtQ3FY3R/2
pgR7Zzk!6sq5OCbXxx4nWYaxTr9gkNRnzmqeyeqOJlNYHUIBQjoX0xsG6tDUU8cuI46pJ4fpiJJS
mcSfZ3vQ
> |X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> |X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> |X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> |X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
> |X-Postfilter: 1.1
> |
> |Well hello everyone. Seems like we finally reached civilsation here...
> |
> |--
> |Rob
> |
> |Help me build up my army in Kings of Chaos, a roleplaying game.
> |and click on the link below!
> |http://www.kingsofchaos.com/recruit.php?uniqid=m3esci84
>
> There is one more posted from karoo.kcom.com that was not moderated.
>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
> I would look as if karoo.co.uk have added it, but not made it moderated
> this is one for the moderators to chase up.
>
> Bye
>
> {R}
Oi Ashton get a life, there's a great big world out there try joining
it!
"AlexB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> >> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> >> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them
has
> >> been
> >> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
missposted.
> >> 7374
> >> >
> >> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying
to
> >> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the
demon or
> >> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled
by the
> >> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still
not
> >> objectionable.
> >
> >7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
> >were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
> >servers, not because it was objectionable.
> >
No problem then
"{R}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000,
> [email protected] (fred) wrote:
> }On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> } [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> }> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> }> news:[email protected]...
> }> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> }> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> }> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them
has
> }> > > been seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> }> > > missposted. 7374
> }> >
> }> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying
to
> }> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the
demon or
> }> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled
by the
> }> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> }> >
> }> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still
not
> }> objectionable.
> }
> }7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
> }were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
> }servers, not because it was objectionable.
> }
> }If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
> }replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
> }and try to prevent it from happening again.
> }
> }And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
> }looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.
>
> This is the offending post as you can see it is only on alt.net
>
> |Xref: news uk.local.yorkshire.moderated:2072
> |Path:
cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.usenetserver.com!border1.nntp.sjc.gi
ganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.karoo.co.uk!n
ews.karoo.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
> |NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:11:33 -0600
> |From: "Rob Overfield" <[email protected]>
> |Newsgroups: uk.local.yorkshire.moderated
> |Subject: Yooo-hoooo!!!
> |Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:10:13 -0000
> |X-Priority: 3
> |X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> |X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> |X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> |Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> |Lines: 12
> |NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.249.171.93
> |X-Trace:
sv3-wimtvCcZnz7uYWInCVkeBFedNtnthzb5ZlgUnRyJsxb6S77dBZzsLXz6H7CotUQtQ3FY3R/2
pgR7Zzk!6sq5OCbXxx4nWYaxTr9gkNRnzmqeyeqOJlNYHUIBQjoX0xsG6tDUU8cuI46pJ4fpiJJS
mcSfZ3vQ
> |X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> |X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> |X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> |X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
> |X-Postfilter: 1.1
> |
> |Well hello everyone. Seems like we finally reached civilsation here...
> |
> |--
> |Rob
> |
> |Help me build up my army in Kings of Chaos, a roleplaying game.
> |and click on the link below!
> |http://www.kingsofchaos.com/recruit.php?uniqid=m3esci84
>
> There is one more posted from karoo.kcom.com that was not moderated.
>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
> I would look as if karoo.co.uk have added it, but not made it moderated
> this is one for the moderators to chase up.
>
> Bye
>
> {R}
Oi Ashton get a life, there's a great big world out there try joining
it!
