Big raspberry

[fred]

On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has been
> seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted. 7374

If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
bot so it's a bit of a mystery.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[Tommy Harris]

"fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
> > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
been
> > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
7374
>
> If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>
> --
Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
objectionable.


tommy

 

[Waldo Centini]

Richard surprised us with

> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> missposted. 7374 }
> }Bollocks
>
> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
> will get the above rejection.
>
> Live with it, sunshine.

BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.

--
Waldo


*** Is This A Dead Parrot I See Before Me ***
To respond through email remove removespam

 

[Waldo Centini]

Richard surprised us with

> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> missposted. 7374 }
> }Bollocks
>
> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
> will get the above rejection.
>
> Live with it, sunshine.
>
> {R}

Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
out?

--
Waldo


*** Is This A Dead Parrot I See Before Me ***
To respond through email remove removespam

 

[fred]

On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has been
> seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted. 7374

If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
bot so it's a bit of a mystery.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[Tommy Harris]

"fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
> > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
been
> > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
7374
>
> If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>
> --
Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
objectionable.


tommy

 

[Waldo Centini]

Richard surprised us with

> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> missposted. 7374 }
> }Bollocks
>
> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
> will get the above rejection.
>
> Live with it, sunshine.

BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.

--
Waldo


*** Is This A Dead Parrot I See Before Me ***
To respond through email remove removespam

 

[Waldo Centini]

Richard surprised us with

> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
> missposted. 7374 }
> }Bollocks
>
> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
> will get the above rejection.
>
> Live with it, sunshine.
>
> {R}

Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
out?

--
Waldo


*** Is This A Dead Parrot I See Before Me ***
To respond through email remove removespam

 

[fred]

On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has been
> seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted. 7374

If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
bot so it's a bit of a mystery.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[Tommy Harris]

"fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
> > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
been
> > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
7374
>
> If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>
> --
Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
objectionable.


tommy

 

[fred]

On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been
> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
> 7374
> >
> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >
> > --
> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
> objectionable.

7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
servers, not because it was objectionable.

If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
and try to prevent it from happening again.

And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[fred]

On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been
> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
> 7374
> >
> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >
> > --
> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
> objectionable.

7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
servers, not because it was objectionable.

If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
and try to prevent it from happening again.

And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[fred]

On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been
> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
> 7374
> >
> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >
> > --
> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
> objectionable.

7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
servers, not because it was objectionable.

If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
and try to prevent it from happening again.

And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[fred]

On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been
> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
> 7374
> >
> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >
> > --
> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
> objectionable.

7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
servers, not because it was objectionable.

If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
and try to prevent it from happening again.

And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[fred]

On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been
> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
> 7374
> >
> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >
> > --
> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
> objectionable.

7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
servers, not because it was objectionable.

If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
and try to prevent it from happening again.

And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[fred]

On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:

> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
> been
> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
> 7374
> >
> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
> >
> > --
> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
> objectionable.

7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
servers, not because it was objectionable.

If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
and try to prevent it from happening again.

And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

--
ô
õçîd

 

[AlexB]

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:05 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>
>BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.

LOL
..

 

[AlexB]

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:07 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>>
>> {R}
>
>Dear me, how nice we are to each other! Is there a way to moderate these two
>out?

Not likely. Fred and Richard are the owners of this group.
..

 

[AlexB]

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:55:04 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:

>On Saturday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>
>> "fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Friday, in article <[email protected]>
>> > [email protected] "Tommy Harris" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been
>> > > seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have missposted.
>> 7374
>> >
>> > If you could you send me the headers of the article you were replying to
>> > I will try and find out what went wrong. It never arrived on the demon or
>> > the NIN newsbases and doesn't seem to have been passed or cancelled by the
>> > bot so it's a bit of a mystery.
>> >
>> > --
>> Its there far all to see ,7374 .Toilet humour I grant you but still not
>> objectionable.
>
>7374 was the article you posted, it was rejected because the article you
>were replying to wasn't passed by the bot and doesn't exist on most
>servers, not because it was objectionable.
>
>If you, or anyone else, could send me the headers of the article you were
>replying to, or post them here, I will try to find out what went wrong
>and try to prevent it from happening again.
>
>And if Rob Overfield is reading this...hi Rob, we arn't ignoring you, it
>looks like your article only got posted to the alt.net server.

It's not a very good modbot if it's losing articles :-(
..

 

[AlexB]

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:45:05 +0000, Waldo Centini
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Richard surprised us with
>
>> In uk.local.yorkshire.moderated on Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:45:04 +0000,
>> "Tommy Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> }Reject reason given --> Your post has references but none of them has
>> been }seen in ulym in the last month it would seem that you have
>> missposted. 7374 }
>> }Bollocks
>>
>> **** you to; *MY* Bot does not make mistakes like that, if you followed
>> up on an article that is not registered in the Bot's history then you
>> will get the above rejection.
>>
>> Live with it, sunshine.
>
>BTW, I think I have found a purpose for a large cactus, very cheap.

LOL
..