dbox2's (neutrino and enigma1) were streaming long before dream existed
All the software was started by the tuxbox boys so really dream did the same to the tuxbox boys as tm are doing to dream.
But it is shamefull that the streaming doesn't work as it's very old technology.
/ # /usr/sbin/smbd
usr/sbin/smbd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.5' not found (required by /usr/sbin/smbd)
/ # /usr/sbin/nmbd
usr/sbin/nmbd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.5' not found (required by /usr/sbin/nmbd)
/ #
to add to what i already posted about the clones. if theyre so quality made etc. i bought my original DM800 the week they were released, it gets a little warm all on its own, but still works brilliantly for what i want.
the clones have been through about a dozen different hardware revisions just on the tuner alone, the mainboard has undergone quite a few hardware changes as well, including updated voltage rectifiers, capacitor fixes, heatsinks, fans, to name a few that are obvious between early and newer clones, the people who have paid for this development are the ones who bought the first, unuseable, clones, and are stuck with them
the software itself is open source, only the brand name 'enigma' (for use in DVB receivers) is 'owned' by DMM, and as pointed out, they took advantage of the open source GPL that surrounds it all to use with their hardware
when DMM stops all R&D as its not economically sound for them to continue to do so, who will be shouting the loudest about it? the clone owners, connected to their dirt cheap servers, who havent helped with a single cent towards the development, who will it affect the most? the true hobbyists, who do it for the hobby of it, not to save a few quid
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.