What is the difference between the various Solo2 clones ?
- Thread starter mickmc68
- Start date
There are some hardware differences such as the Sunray version has a plug n play flash chip easy to remove will later versions of it do.
If i were you the Sunray version is the only way to go but saying that the real solo 2 boxes are not that much more expensive than the clones.
Personally for the price difference id give the clones a miss and go genuine.
If i were you the Sunray version is the only way to go but saying that the real solo 2 boxes are not that much more expensive than the clones.
Personally for the price difference id give the clones a miss and go genuine.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 2,601
- Reaction score
- 1,674
It's the built-in security chip I believe that may not like the clone-safe drivers from another clone manufacturer.
Odd few people have said their Solo2 SE can take images/drivers for Sunray but majority can't and to be honest if it can't it means you're stuck with Lonrison safe images and the only Lonrison clone-safe drivers there is are really old so images now could be unstable. In fact BlackHole 2.1.5 isn't compatible with Lonrison due to simple fact is Lonrison safe drivers are too old. This could be true of other images soon.
I would consider either Sunray (with detachable/independent flash chip) or original.
Odd few people have said their Solo2 SE can take images/drivers for Sunray but majority can't and to be honest if it can't it means you're stuck with Lonrison safe images and the only Lonrison clone-safe drivers there is are really old so images now could be unstable. In fact BlackHole 2.1.5 isn't compatible with Lonrison due to simple fact is Lonrison safe drivers are too old. This could be true of other images soon.
I would consider either Sunray (with detachable/independent flash chip) or original.
jacobrichards
Inactive User
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
I know someone who has both non and clone and they cant tell the difference.
