On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>>> What prompted this question?
>>
>>It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
tell you. I feel such a tit.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>>> What prompted this question?
>>
>>It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
tell you. I feel such a tit.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>>> What prompted this question?
>>
>>It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
tell you. I feel such a tit.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>>> What prompted this question?
>>
>>It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
tell you. I feel such a tit.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>>> What prompted this question?
>>
>>It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
tell you. I feel such a tit.
On Saturday, in article
<[email protected]> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >> What prompted this question?
> >
> >It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
On Saturday, in article
<[email protected]> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >> What prompted this question?
> >
> >It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
On Saturday, in article
<[email protected]> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >> What prompted this question?
> >
> >It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
On Saturday, in article
<[email protected]> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >> What prompted this question?
> >
> >It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
On Saturday, in article
<[email protected]> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >> What prompted this question?
> >
> >It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
On Saturday, in article
<[email protected]> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >> What prompted this question?
> >
> >It was a terrible pun.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:35:10 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article
> <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> >> What prompted this question?
>> >
>> >It was a terrible pun.
>>
>> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
>> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
>
>I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
>We should have a Pun Of The Year competition.
You actually think this thred's funny?
You're very easily amused.
Personally, I think it's a bit sad, especially as it's all been seen
and done before on ULY.
..
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:00:09 +0000, Steve Fleischer wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>>>> What prompted this question?
>>>
>>>It was a terrible pun.
>>
>> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
>> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
>
> No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
> tell you. I feel such a tit.
Eider kept me head down. I bet Ian's Chough'ed
--
John Bean
I like to tell people I have the heart of a small boy.
Then I say it's in a jar on my desk (Stephen King)
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:35:10 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article
> <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> >> What prompted this question?
>> >
>> >It was a terrible pun.
>>
>> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
>> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
>
>I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
>We should have a Pun Of The Year competition.
You actually think this thred's funny?
You're very easily amused.
Personally, I think it's a bit sad, especially as it's all been seen
and done before on ULY.
..
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:00:09 +0000, Steve Fleischer wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>>>> What prompted this question?
>>>
>>>It was a terrible pun.
>>
>> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
>> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
>
> No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
> tell you. I feel such a tit.
Eider kept me head down. I bet Ian's Chough'ed
--
John Bean
I like to tell people I have the heart of a small boy.
Then I say it's in a jar on my desk (Stephen King)
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:35:10 +0000, [email protected] (fred)
wrote:
>On Saturday, in article
> <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Ian D" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> >> What prompted this question?
>> >
>> >It was a terrible pun.
>>
>> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
>> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
>
>I know, I think my poirot flew right over a few heads.
>We should have a Pun Of The Year competition.
You actually think this thred's funny?
You're very easily amused.
Personally, I think it's a bit sad, especially as it's all been seen
and done before on ULY.
..
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:00:09 +0000, Steve Fleischer wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:15:07 +0000, Ian D wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:40:05 +0000, "Ali Hopkins"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Steve Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>>>> What prompted this question?
>>>
>>>It was a terrible pun.
>>
>> Oh, I dunno. Well up to the prevailing standard I'd have said.
>> It's a bit of a bustard when it's not recognised though.
>
> No need to snipe, Ian. This whole business has given me quite a tern, I can
> tell you. I feel such a tit.
Eider kept me head down. I bet Ian's Chough'ed
--
John Bean
I like to tell people I have the heart of a small boy.
Then I say it's in a jar on my desk (Stephen King)
