A migrant centre branded 'inhumane'

Joe Noodles

VIP Member
VIP Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
3,885
A migrant centre in Durham has been branded 'inhumane' because of slow Wi-Fi speeds and no hair dressing salon. πŸ˜πŸ˜†πŸ˜πŸ˜†πŸ˜πŸ˜†

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
It is more inhumane to the UK taxpayers who have to work and pay their taxes in order to support these illegal economic migrants, true asylum seekers would be happy with anything, as long as they were in a place that was safe, dry and warm, where they could could get a decent meal once a day without worrying if they were going to be tortured or killed.
 
It is more inhumane to the UK taxpayers who have to work and pay their taxes in order to support these illegal economic migrants, true asylum seekers would be happy with anything, as long as they were in a place that was safe, dry and warm, where they could could get a decent meal once a day without worrying if they were going to be tortured or killed.
They probably were happy until the "do-gooder" charities and solicitors got a hold of them telling them what they were entitled to. I use the word entitled but can't imagine why.
 
It will never be stopped as long as the nobbers stand on the beach giving them towels hot drinks and pointing them to the bus to the UK free system.
I always remember years back Mrya Hindley and the priest or vicar who started a national campaign to have her released as she'd been in jail long enough and it was, quote "inhumane" to keep her in jail forever.

The point to that is, there's always a squadron of do-gooders who think these (mainly) Albanians are escaping persecution when their actually escaping jail for crimes they commited in their homeland.

Google "Grow farm Albanians UK"

Nearly returns as many as typing the word "Porn"

As for Durham ?

Albanian man set up cannabis farm in County Durham home

I bet his WiFi was ok
 
I do feel sorry for "real asylum seekers" but even then the rules governing the safety of those asylum seekers state that they should seek safety in the closest country from the country they are escaping from.
So in reality we should not have any asylum seekers in Great Britain, in which case we as a nation should then offer the "Freedom Nation" a helping hand by offering placement for some of those asylum seekers and some kind of financial help for the "Freedom Nation" to accommodate those seeking asylum.
Those who arrive on our shores have not abided by those rules and so should to returned to either the country they originated from or the nearest "safe country" to their origin.
 
We need to strike up a deal with Albania and pay them to take them back. Now you might think that's stupid but it's a far better idea and cheaper than letting them stay
 
My parents and his friends, relatives and comrades fought the Germans to stop them invading the UK, many of them lost their lives or limbs doing so, thinking that they were securing their country for future generations.

Now because of the looney lefty liberals and our weak governments who didn't stop or reverse what Blair and his cronies when they did their best, and sadly achieved it, to turn the UK into a multicultural lawless society, we have been left in this ridiculous situation where we cannot stop any Tom Dick or Abdul coming here, to try and turn our country into one like the ones that they claim to be fleeing from, supposedly to have a better life.

I wonder how many of those brave men and women who fought and risked their lives and limbs for us in 1914-1918 and 1939-1945 would have done so as willingly as they did if they had known what the country would be becoming like towards the end of the 20th century
 
My parents and his friends, relatives and comrades fought the Germans to stop them invading the UK, many of them lost their lives or limbs doing so, thinking that they were securing their country for future generations.

Now because of the looney lefty liberals and our weak governments who didn't stop or reverse what Blair and his cronies when they did their best, and sadly achieved it, to turn the UK into a multicultural lawless society, we have been left in this ridiculous situation where we cannot stop any Tom Dick or Abdul coming here, to try and turn our country into one like the ones that they claim to be fleeing from, supposedly to have a better life.

I wonder how many of those brave men and women who fought and risked their lives and limbs for us in 1914-1918 and 1939-1945 would have done so as willingly as they did if they had known what the country would be becoming like towards the end of the 20th century
Sandra51, I agree with what you are saying but we must also acknowledge those migrants who were invited and have added to and helped our Nation but have suffered for who they are. Many will automatically assume that means the Black and Asian migrants who came here when requested, but it also applies to many who moved within the United Kingdom. Scots, Irish and Welsh tradesmen and workers moved to England and suffered racism (and no doubt English people who moved to Scotland, Ireland and Wales also suffered exactly the same). My family moved from Scotland to England in the late 1950's when many English Companies pleaded for workers, especially experienced Tradesmen to move to fill the vacancies.
The notices on many pub doors back then were "No Blacks, Irish, Jocks or Dogs". I quickly learned to speak in a Local English accent so that I didn't get set upon, many Blacks and Asians also done the same but their colour obviously set them aside hence why many people seem to assume racism is only about skin colour.
Unfortunately there are now far too many White, Black, Asian and any other skin shades in between who only see Britain as an easy touch and cushy place to claim what is available to them which in many cases is more difficult for the indigenous population to receive what they are rightly entitled to.
We need to look after "our own" (which must include 2nd, 3rd and more generation migrants) first
 
The whole wording of this story is wrong and misleading.

CHANNEL NIGHTMARE
OVER 1000 MIGRANTS CROSSED WITHIN THE PAST 2 DAYS

They are not migrants. They entered this Country illegally and are illegal immigrants. Their very 1st act on British soil was to break the law.
After paying criminals an extortionate fee to risk their lives at sea they get put up in Hotels, etc; and complain about it. Prior to that they've been shitting in the woods for God only knows how long.
The French don't seem to be putting them up in Hotels, why us??
 
I had to laugh at Rishi saying that he will make the legal immigrants pay more for their visas and for healthcare in order to fund the pay increases that he announced for the public sector workers.

For some reason he forgot to mention that all the illegal economic migrants coming across the channel in the small boats will of course still continue to get completely free and the highest quality healthcare in the country, regardless of cost, including dental, much quicker than any of us whose taxes and NI over the years will be able to get it, and they will continue to get free 4 star hotel accomodation, meals, iphones and spending money for as long as it takes before they are given the right to remain and then get a free house so that they can bring their relatives over. Then once they have got their British passport they will of course be free to go back home to visit friends and other relatives, in those countries that they claim to be fleeing from in fear of their lives, for more holidays abroad than most UK taxpayers could afford.
 
The part that kills me is, over 60% are Albanians, Albania is classed as a safe country they are not asylum seekers running from persecution they are illegal migrants who illegally gained entry to the country so let's get that bit straight.

As for those who travel across the med to Italy Greece etc. Yes some are travelling war torn countries and are looking for a safe place.

So once they land they are away from their life threatening situation but oh no that isn't enough because they have read and are told that their best bet is to trek a 1200miles+ and head for UK crossing safe country after safe country then a final dangerous boat ride (that isn't free by the way) to get to our shores and be looked after for free.

What's worse, the Albanians that arrive are 85% young males and a large number are criminals escaping jail or they are sent and paid for by organised Albanian criminal gangs sent to addresses were there'll be a mattress on a floor and a grow farm to look after.

My last question
Why don't these migrants head for Poland ? It's closer and no channel crossing in a dinghy Google it you'll see.

There are huge fights breaking out between Albanians and Eritreans with sharpened weapons on our shores at holding areas and were allowing them to stay for months or years?.
It's time to take a stance, you enter via an illegal method you are shipped back the next day.
 
The ECHR and Labour keep blocking everything the Gov who try to block/stop them, send them back or on to Rwanda
God help us if Labour get in next year

The dogooders say the Rwanda scheme is not working :rolleyes: of course not cos it has not started, you keep stopping it
They will not pay thousands to smugglers if they know as soon as they land they will be sent to of to Rwanda or back to the war torn country called france
 
It's time to take a stance, you enter via an illegal method you are shipped back the next day.
Which brings us back to square one.
Where???
France, Belgium and Germany won't have them back. Why would they?? Without a passport you can't send them back to their home Country either without a lot of red tape, investigation and time.

Even if you could there will be a last minute court injunction to stop the flight. Any law you try to get passed will be opposed by Labour and even if the law gets passed the Court of Human Rights will overturn it.

The stance has already been taken but is being prevented from being implemented. The media flashed up outrageous sums of money it would cost per person to be sent to Rwanda. We all know that if the Rwandan flights were implemented the boat trips across the Channel would practically cease so the actual cost would be minimal.
 
Which ever country they departed from bollocks to red tape ship them back were not a member of the EU. If you fly in from Zambia with no papers no ID your shipped back to Zambia the country you departed from.
Let's take a leaf out of Poland's stance on illegal immigrants, zero tolerance.

The figures on terrorists attacks in Poland and migrants speak for themselves.

It says a lot about these people when their risking their lives to cross the channel when there already 1000's of miles from the so called threat to their life's.

Remember there's 2 sides to every conflict and large numbers of both sides are leaving war torn countries to set their conflicts up elsewere.
Me?, Issue them a backpack, head them to the nearest airport and say it's cheaper to fly them to London then head to France and push them out and hope the so called "backpack" opens.

At the end of the day they illegally heading from France so that's were they go back to , period
 
When France says non, what then?? πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚
No permission to land a plane, no permission to dock a boat.

Imagine if the immigrants were leaving our shores to go to France and they wanted to send them back. Would we accept them back??

If solutions were so simple we wouldn't need a Government. We could debate all our woes on forums and Facebook and make the World a better place. I'm afraid we're well and truly stuck with them unless we can silence the opposition.
 
When France says non, what then?? πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚
No permission to land a plane, no permission to dock a boat.

Imagine if the immigrants were leaving our shores to go to France and they wanted to send them back. Would we accept them back??

If solutions were so simple we wouldn't need a Government. We could debate all our woes on forums and Facebook and make the World a better place. I'm afraid we're well and truly stuck with them unless we can silence the opposition.
Fill up a few Hercules aircraft with them, tell them that they are going on an all expenses paid tour of England, give them all a parachute then fly them to some isolated barren land in the south of France and shove them out of the door. As far as they know when the yland they are still in England and the French won't know how they got there :)
 
Fill up a few Hercules aircraft with them, tell them that they are going on an all expenses paid tour of England, give them all a parachute then fly them to some isolated barren land in the south of France and shove them out of the door. As far as they know when the yland they are still in England and the French won't know how they got there :)
Replace the parachutes with rubber dinghiesπŸ˜‰
 
The ECHR and Labour keep blocking everything the Gov who try to block/stop them, send them back or on to Rwanda
God help us if Labour get in next year

The dogooders say the Rwanda scheme is not working :rolleyes: of course not cos it has not started, you keep stopping it
They will not pay thousands to smugglers if they know as soon as they land they will be sent to of to Rwanda or back to the war torn country called france
If the government have enough of a majority to get anti strike legislation through then they have enough voters to get anti immigration legislation through DO NOT blame the labour party for this as that is totally false.
 
If the government have enough of a majority to get anti strike legislation through then they have enough voters to get anti immigration legislation through DO NOT blame the labour party for this as that is totally false.
They aren't helping in any way at all though are they and they keep voting against anything that would help fix the problem which, along with a few Tory Mps like the idiot Mitchell, who wants us to increase foreign aid instead of only using it for unforeseen natural disasters, and the courts and the crooked immigration lawyers, who a few of the probably hundreds or thousands of them were exposed last week, are doing their best to stop anyone from ever being deported.

The best that Starmer and his band of miserable men and women can come up with to stop the boats is to catch the people smugglers in France, without realising that Macron will never allow any Brits to go to France to do that, just as he will not allow us to take the illegal economic migrants back to France once any of our boats have picked them up mid channel, as that would mean they would become France's problem and not ours.
 
Back
Top