Oh man, I do not agree
The Qboxhd - Mini Qbox Hd are a huge Laugh. I had them both.
They had the same problems and still behave like all other boxes(F* clones) Like the Azbox and the Vu+ Duo, ...
CCcam reversing = always Tricky and always A veriosn behind, or like the QBox in fact they use something alike which the diabowifi uses.
Oh yeah we have oscam, which is working for some ...
Problems with recording on 2 tuners or even One
Green screen crashing
Corrupt Usb memory
Interlan HD, Too much Heat
They use certain Cpu which is not enough for proper HD or copied/cloned Enigma OS.
and so on...
The fact remains
Dreambox Multimedia is the very best on the market , if you want to pay less and have a go at other boxes. Then do that BUT DO NOT COMPLAIN AFTERWARDS.
I still think/hope on the long run TM Linux receivers will solve its problems but it will take time.
I'm Happy there is a new team or several teams working on the TM linux recievers now ...
Also I would suggest that people stop bitching on Dr linux. I always see very interesting and clear info coming from him.
I have seen and had a quick play with QBox mini HD and recording works fine from 2 tuners to USB. I dont own one, so havent doen any extensive tests but from what I see was working fine with CCCam line in RADAR. Yes the original Qbox was a complete flop...The Mini looks better though.
Everyone apart from Dream uses "copied/cloned Enigma 2 OS" are Dream not the main devleopers of Enigma ? Dream recently put a court injucntion against VU for "illegally" using the "Enigma 2" brand as Dream claim it's their trademark.
" Dream proceeds against trademark infringements
Dream Multimedia, the leading supplier of Linux-based set-top boxes, has brought a temporary injunction against Satco Europe GmbH. At the Anga Cable show in Cologne, Satco presented, among other items, its TV player VU+ Duo, and promotion for this infringes the brand rights of Dream.
Satco is illegally using the designation „Enigma“, which is a registered brand name of Dream. In an advertising flyer, Satco promotes the Linux operating system installed on the VU+ with the designation „Enigma 2“. Moreover, the designation „Enigma“ appears when the set-top box boots up.
With the temporary injunction, the district court in Düsseldorf prohibits Satco from using the designation „Enigma 2“, including offering for sale set-top boxes equipped with operating systems so designated. Contravention of the court order can lead to a fine of up to 250.000 Euros, or a prison sentence of up to six months.
This court order is only the first step. In future, Dream also plans to proceed against other producers who illegally use brands owned by Dream.
Dream spokesperson Alpaslan Karasu: „We will definitely no longer stand around and watch while competitors exploit our good name in order to sell their products.“
district court of Dusseldorf, 2a O 140/11 "
- So basically TM, VU and anyone else using Enigma 2 is according to Dream, illegally using their trademarks...
- Lets face it, most competitors are just using modifed Dreambox images...
" Also I would suggest that people stop bitching on Dr linux. I always see very interesting and clear info coming from him. "
- Really all I have seen from him are rants and raves, and denying of problems claiming his own box is working 100% and everyone else is wrong...Anyone who doesnt agree is a rival competitior/trader...etc....Instead of talking rubbish he should concentrate on fixing the issues with the reciever which after 12 months is still a shambles....