Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Teenager held over fire extinguisher 'murder bid'

snapman

VIP Member
Staff member
VIP Member
Premium Member
An 18-year-old has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder over a fire extinguisher thrown at officers during the Millbank riot.
teenager-held-fire-extinguisher-murder-bid.jpg


Scotland Yard said the man was detained by Hampshire Police in Southampton. He is now travelling to London where he will be questioned by officers from the Metropolitan Police later.

On Friday, a 23-year-old student at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, was arrested and then released on bail on suspicion of violent disorder.

A Met spokesman said: "This arrest follows an investigation into public disorder where a fire extinguisher was thrown from the roof of Millbank Tower."

Police Federation representatives have called for the person who flung the empty metal fire extinguisher to be charged with attempted murder. Senior officers said it narrowly missed injuring two territorial support group officers, brushing down the back of one and hitting the knees of another.

The incident was one of the defining moments of the four-hour stand-off last week after a breakaway group of students attacked the Millbank office complex.

Up to 50 demonstrators smashed windows, discharged fire extinguishers and threw debris from the roof of the building. But hundreds of others gathered in a forecourt below booed the culprit and shouted to others to stop damaging the building and throwing missiles.

The Met said ten of the 54 people arrested during sprawling outbreaks of disorder were under the age of 18.

Source
 
This guy is goign to get the full force of the law.

In this case there would be only 2 facts to consider, they are

Actus reus

The act - cxannot deny he carried out the act and the main one to decide is the Mens rea

The state of mind, did he know what he was doing - I think so therfore I feelk sorry for this guy - He probably did not think about hios actions at the time

But boy is he in shit

Actus reus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mens rea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Actus Reus - Actus Reus Versus Mens Rea - Morality, Moral, Law, Murder, Accused, and Criminal
 
i thought murder had to be premeditated, although it was a very stupid thing to do i doubt he thought his actions through beforehand
 
The premedetated part is the mens rea and the clincher between murder and attempted murder - but this rule is used in all laws as you will see that sentances depend on if the act was premeditated or not, if so then a higher sentance is given - it known as the wicked state of mind
 
That was absolutly crazy what he did, how could he know for sure that someone will not get hurt.
 
Fek him, hope they send the cnut down for a spell in prison, he will probably get off lightly, he shouldn't but he probably will not spend more than a year inside. Some hot shot lawyer will find a loop hole.

That student was not such a clever student.
 
the idiot probably thought he was being clever bet he dont think so now
i dont like coppers in my view biggest bunch of lying thieving cnuts there is but no-one deserves what he tried to do hope he gets life
attempted does mean he tried to but did not succeed
the fooking dimwit knew he could kill someone if he did that so fook him
 
Last edited by a moderator:
His intentions were premeditated as he knew he was going to throw the fire extinguisher from the roof the premeditated murder side depended on weather it hit someone and killed them.

The dick deserves all he gets and the rest of them who caused the damage etc.
 
Back
Top