ntlworld mail rant

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:25:21 +0100, Graham wrote:

> Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
> 'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
> was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

<counts repeated posts>

Well, you certainly have no problems posting to newsgroups! ;O)

--
Ian Cox
Sutton-in-Ashfield
icq 116510696
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:25:21 +0100, Graham wrote:

> Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
> 'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
> was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

<counts repeated posts>

Well, you certainly have no problems posting to newsgroups! ;O)

--
Ian Cox
Sutton-in-Ashfield
icq 116510696
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:25:21 +0100, Graham wrote:

> Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
> 'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
> was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

<counts repeated posts>

Well, you certainly have no problems posting to newsgroups! ;O)

--
Ian Cox
Sutton-in-Ashfield
icq 116510696
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:25:21 +0100, Graham wrote:

> Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
> 'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
> was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

<counts repeated posts>

Well, you certainly have no problems posting to newsgroups! ;O)

--
Ian Cox
Sutton-in-Ashfield
icq 116510696
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:25:21 +0100, Graham wrote:

> Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
> 'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
> was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

<counts repeated posts>

Well, you certainly have no problems posting to newsgroups! ;O)

--
Ian Cox
Sutton-in-Ashfield
icq 116510696
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
"Ant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Graham" wrote in alt.spam ...
>
> > Freeserve recently started to mark my mail from gisajob.com as *** SPAM
***
> > in the subject field. Does anyone know if this method is a replacement
for,
> > or an addition to Freeserves failure to deliver mail with certain
single
> > line message bodies, as a crude way of filtering w32Netsky variants.
>
> "In addition to", I believe. The only other crude filtering I'm aware
> of, is the rejection or dropping of emails with certain subject lines
> used by viruses. "Test" and "Hello" are examples. I don't think they
> look at message bodies.
>
>

Last night I sent 2 emails from one of my freeserve accounts, one with
'test' in the subject and the other with 'test' in the body. The subject one
was deliverd, I am still waiting for the body one.

Graham


%Profound_observation%
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

rawsy
    • Like
For sale rax10 router
Replies
0
Views
165
rawsy
rawsy
alimac
    • Like
Bitvise SSH Client 9.35
Replies
0
Views
158
alimac
alimac
R
Alternatives to Virgin.
Replies
10
Views
246
sneaker
sneaker
O
    • Like
Microsoft to cease all support for older MS Office versions
Replies
0
Views
145
Oggiman
O
O
    • Like
LG smart TVs just added a great free streaming upgrade
Replies
0
Views
153
Oggiman
O
Back
Top