Hi there, I got some sound advice here last tiime I purchased a bike, so hoping for the same.
I'm looking to upgrade my old Claude Butler bike, and my budget is in the region of £300.
I've spotted these two at the minute
Kona Fire Mountain Deluxe 2009 for £332, (I managed to get an extra 5% off price when I contacted the shop)
Kona Fire Mountain Deluxe 2009 : Cycle | Cycling | Singletrack Bikes
and
GT Aggressor XC 3 for £280 (halfords have an extra 20% of GT's today - so I've reserved one)
GT Aggressor XC 3 Mountain Bike 09 18" from Halfords Price £349.99 Web Exclusive! 20% Off ALL GT Bikes. Discount applied when added to basket
Most of the components are comparable (lockout forks etc) but the main differences are the gears and the brakes.
The GT has Hydraulic disc brakes, the Kona has mechanical, and the Kona has Deore gears, whilst the GT has only Acera.
I've only ever had mechainical disc brakes so don't know if its worth picking a bike for the upgraded ones - are they all that different. I can appreciate the value of the better gear system, but the GT is £50 cheaper and the two deraillers (on chain reaction cycles) come to this - so I could replace as things fall off.
I'm leaning towards the GT (mainly because of the price) but Kona is the more recognisable brand (to me anyway) so I'd assume the frame would be better, although when looking for reviews on the lower end kona bikes they are few and far between. If anything people are questioning the quality of Kona in recent years...
What do you guys think, or can anyone suggest any others?
Cheers
I'm looking to upgrade my old Claude Butler bike, and my budget is in the region of £300.
I've spotted these two at the minute
Kona Fire Mountain Deluxe 2009 for £332, (I managed to get an extra 5% off price when I contacted the shop)
Kona Fire Mountain Deluxe 2009 : Cycle | Cycling | Singletrack Bikes
and
GT Aggressor XC 3 for £280 (halfords have an extra 20% of GT's today - so I've reserved one)
GT Aggressor XC 3 Mountain Bike 09 18" from Halfords Price £349.99 Web Exclusive! 20% Off ALL GT Bikes. Discount applied when added to basket
Most of the components are comparable (lockout forks etc) but the main differences are the gears and the brakes.
The GT has Hydraulic disc brakes, the Kona has mechanical, and the Kona has Deore gears, whilst the GT has only Acera.
I've only ever had mechainical disc brakes so don't know if its worth picking a bike for the upgraded ones - are they all that different. I can appreciate the value of the better gear system, but the GT is £50 cheaper and the two deraillers (on chain reaction cycles) come to this - so I could replace as things fall off.
I'm leaning towards the GT (mainly because of the price) but Kona is the more recognisable brand (to me anyway) so I'd assume the frame would be better, although when looking for reviews on the lower end kona bikes they are few and far between. If anything people are questioning the quality of Kona in recent years...
What do you guys think, or can anyone suggest any others?
Cheers