Danum Play's

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

Re: Apology: Was Re: Danum Play's

x-no-archive: yes
Michael Tombs Childcare Services wrote:
news:SCbYb.6142$Y%[email protected]

> Apologies, the message was meant to be in plain text, no offence was meant
> to have been caused.
>
> I am new to this list and thought it might help me to promote this great
new
> venture I am about to embark upon.
>
> Once again, please accept my sincere apologies, I will not post any future
> html messages and will be more selective about any posts I submit or
respond
> to.

To understand more of newsgroups read news:uk.net.beginners,
news:news.announce.newusers and news:news.newusers.questions

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
Ian D wrote: news:[email protected]

> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:55:02 +0000, John Bean <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>> But it did not have any html when it got to news.individual.net, this is
>>> all I got ;-)
>>
>> <sigh> Of course it did, that's the server I collected it from.
>
> So did I and no html here either.
> However I'm using Agent, like Dave, and it's down to the newsreader
> and not the server. I'm pretty certain that there's no option in Agent
> to trigger html on or off.
> It's off, by default, and stays that way - and long may that continue.

you won't be turning it on any time soon; Agent does not support html!

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
fred wrote: news:[email protected]

> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>
>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>> no how.
>>
>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>> moderation style.
>
> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
> I would have blocked it.
>
> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.

yes! breakthrough!

> Someone
> has just as much right to post asking for help with setting up childrens
> play groups as they do to chat about beer and curry or the war in Iraq.
>
> This group was created for the benefit of everyone with an interest in
> Yorkshire, to do with as they wish, just so long as they don't deter
> others from using the group as they wish.

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

Re: Apology: Was Re: Danum Play's

x-no-archive: yes
Michael Tombs Childcare Services wrote:
news:SCbYb.6142$Y%[email protected]

> Apologies, the message was meant to be in plain text, no offence was meant
> to have been caused.
>
> I am new to this list and thought it might help me to promote this great
new
> venture I am about to embark upon.
>
> Once again, please accept my sincere apologies, I will not post any future
> html messages and will be more selective about any posts I submit or
respond
> to.

To understand more of newsgroups read news:uk.net.beginners,
news:news.announce.newusers and news:news.newusers.questions

 

[AlexB]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:55:07 +0000, "One One One Zero Three Seven"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>fred wrote: news:[email protected]
>
>> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
>> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>>
>>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>>> no how.
>>>
>>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>>> moderation style.
>>
>> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
>> I would have blocked it.
>>
>> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
>> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.
>
>yes! breakthrough!

Doesn't really appear to be true.
..

 

[AlexB]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:55:07 +0000, "One One One Zero Three Seven"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>fred wrote: news:[email protected]
>
>> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
>> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>>
>>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>>> no how.
>>>
>>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>>> moderation style.
>>
>> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
>> I would have blocked it.
>>
>> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
>> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.
>
>yes! breakthrough!

Doesn't really appear to be true.
..

 

[AlexB]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:55:07 +0000, "One One One Zero Three Seven"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>fred wrote: news:[email protected]
>
>> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
>> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>>
>>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>>> no how.
>>>
>>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>>> moderation style.
>>
>> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
>> I would have blocked it.
>>
>> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
>> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.
>
>yes! breakthrough!

Doesn't really appear to be true.
..

 

[AlexB]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:55:07 +0000, "One One One Zero Three Seven"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>fred wrote: news:[email protected]
>
>> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
>> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>>
>>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>>> no how.
>>>
>>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>>> moderation style.
>>
>> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
>> I would have blocked it.
>>
>> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
>> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.
>
>yes! breakthrough!

Doesn't really appear to be true.
..

 

[AlexB]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:55:07 +0000, "One One One Zero Three Seven"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>fred wrote: news:[email protected]
>
>> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
>> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>>
>>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>>> no how.
>>>
>>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>>> moderation style.
>>
>> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
>> I would have blocked it.
>>
>> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
>> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.
>
>yes! breakthrough!

Doesn't really appear to be true.
..

 

[AlexB]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:55:07 +0000, "One One One Zero Three Seven"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>fred wrote: news:[email protected]
>
>> On Monday, in article <[email protected]>
>> [email protected] "John Bean" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:50:04 +0000, fred wrote:
>>>
>>>> One article with a bit of html in it aint gonna do nobody no harm
>>>> no how.
>>>
>>> It's not just HTML, it's HTML *SPAM* FFS. Oh, the trolls will love this
>>> moderation style.
>>
>> No, it isn't spam, spam is an abuse of the internet, if it had been spam
>> I would have blocked it.
>>
>> Someone posting here for the first time is every bit a member of this
>> community as someone who has been posting to uly since 1998.
>
>yes! breakthrough!

Doesn't really appear to be true.
..

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
AlexB wrote: news:[email protected]

> Spam will be the death of Usenet unless something is done about it
> soon.

it'll be the death of email as we know it sooner than Usenet.

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
AlexB wrote: news:[email protected]

> Spam will be the death of Usenet unless something is done about it
> soon.

it'll be the death of email as we know it sooner than Usenet.

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
AlexB wrote: news:[email protected]

> Spam will be the death of Usenet unless something is done about it
> soon.

it'll be the death of email as we know it sooner than Usenet.

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
AlexB wrote: news:[email protected]

> Spam will be the death of Usenet unless something is done about it
> soon.

it'll be the death of email as we know it sooner than Usenet.

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
AlexB wrote: news:[email protected]

> Spam will be the death of Usenet unless something is done about it
> soon.

it'll be the death of email as we know it sooner than Usenet.

 

[One One One Zero Three Seven]

x-no-archive: yes
AlexB wrote: news:[email protected]

> Spam will be the death of Usenet unless something is done about it
> soon.

it'll be the death of email as we know it sooner than Usenet.