BBC presenter in scandal named by wife
- Thread starter Oggiman
- Start date
The curious thing about this is that the fuzz have apparently decided that no crime has been committed.
This story just gets more interesting.
He seems to have been a naughty boy, but....
I await further developments.
This story just gets more interesting.
He seems to have been a naughty boy, but....
I await further developments.
I see that the "Sun" now seems to be trying to do a bit of backpedaling on the story.
How The Sun's Huw Edwards story changed - as tabloid finds itself in line of fire
Ex-Sun editor says newspaper faces ‘crisis’ over Huw Edwards scandal
How The Sun's Huw Edwards story changed - as tabloid finds itself in line of fire
Ex-Sun editor says newspaper faces ‘crisis’ over Huw Edwards scandal
They have achieved their objective of ruining the Guy. If he has done nothing criminal then it’s sad.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
- Messages
- 1,729
- Reaction score
- 1,155
Article says he paid for sexually explicit pictures so If they decided this was a crime then would not every subscriber on only fans and every porn site subscriber also be carrying out a crime?
Was the alleged age at time of pics.
Good question. The initial reporting seemed to suggest that the subject was underage, but after the police had questioned everybody concerned they decided that a crime hadn't been commited, so that would suggest that they weren't underage at the time.
There still seems to be conflicting stories coming from all angles here. There's one thing I'd like to know though. Did the Sun pay the parents for the story?
Murdoch's hatred of the Bbc
A source at News UK said the Sun had not made any financial payment to the couple but confirmed that TalkTV was speaking to them as part of a planned three-part documentary series. The television channel has a reputation for paying large sums of money to secure interviews.
The parents, who have not been publicly identified, could not be reached for comment.
The Sun has rowed back on its initial suggestion that illegal underage activity could have taken place and insists its story was always about concerned parents. The 20-year-old at the heart of the story has dismissed their mother and stepfather’s suggestions of illegal behaviour as “rubbish”.
Doesn't appear to be illegal but it's definitely abnormal. The guy is a dirty old git.
The "victim" or should I say "beneficiary" made £35000 out of it so who could blame him. I'd send him a picture of my starfish for £500
The "victim" or should I say "beneficiary" made £35000 out of it so who could blame him. I'd send him a picture of my starfish for £500
Doesn't appear to be illegal but it's definitely abnormal. The guy is a dirty old git.
The "victim" or should I say "beneficiary" made £35000 out of it so who could blame him. I'd send him a picture of my starfish for £500
I hear what you're saying chookey, but I trust what I read in the newspapers and on the net about as much as I trust that old slimebag Murdoch.
I'm waiting until the dust settles and everybody gets their stories straight.
What ever two consenting adults do together is nobody‘s business really as long as it’s not illegal or harming others.
That Murdock and all the tabloids want to make a huge scandal out of something trivial at best.
It’s basically legalised harassment.
Scumbags the lot of them and I wouldn’t buy the Sun to wipe my starfish with but would take for money for pics like @chookey
That Murdock and all the tabloids want to make a huge scandal out of something trivial at best.
It’s basically legalised harassment.
Scumbags the lot of them and I wouldn’t buy the Sun to wipe my starfish with but would take for money for pics like @chookey
100 % AgreeWhat ever two consenting adults do together is nobody‘s business really as long as it’s not illegal or harming others.
That Murdock and all the tabloids want to make a huge scandal out of something trivial at best.
It’s basically legalised harassment.
Scumbags the lot of them and I wouldn’t buy the Sun to wipe my starfish with but would take for money for pics like @chookey
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,413
- Reaction score
- 7,025
I thought it was him paying for pictures so why is there a picture of Huw Edwards doing the rounds stood up with his arse out ?.
Another thing, why?, why pay for pictures?, surely there's enough stuff on the net to get your kicks from were you don't need to pay for it, apparently (coughs twice loudly)
I'm not so sure about all this, I just think there's more to it than meets the eye. I just can't see it been his first time, first time caught yeah but for me definitely not his first time paying for it.
And one last thing, I'd like to ask him how tf did he hide it from his missus ?, I daren't have a bet on the football with her piping up before they've even f**kin kicked off:- "There's £10 pending in the account ! is that you !??"
Another thing, why?, why pay for pictures?, surely there's enough stuff on the net to get your kicks from were you don't need to pay for it, apparently (coughs twice loudly)
I'm not so sure about all this, I just think there's more to it than meets the eye. I just can't see it been his first time, first time caught yeah but for me definitely not his first time paying for it.
And one last thing, I'd like to ask him how tf did he hide it from his missus ?, I daren't have a bet on the football with her piping up before they've even f**kin kicked off:- "There's £10 pending in the account ! is that you !??"
Last edited:
On all accounts thats a Photoshop pic people have been drooling over.
