Welcome to our community
Be apart of something great, join today!
How to convert eCWPK to dCWPK
- Thread starter starsurfer
- Start date
Do you have your pairingid ?
###
also i need someone who has a working 'cwpk' key for caid: 06xx to do test..
if yes i will contact you in private .
Thanks,
;
Last edited:
@rumas I truly think that you need to be transparent about your oscam. If you want to collect the data from those who are using your oscam, you need to be clear about it and explaining what type of data you need from those who are using your oscam, for example, crash logs, etc. If the purpose of that IP address is not for collecting data, then you need to explain why your oscam keep calling that ip address. People who are about to run your oscam will know the risk and advantage, and they can decide by themselves whether they want to run your oscam or not.
Last edited:
Hello,
@ohmza Do you trust whatever written on the net ?
I'll explain to you once forever and clarify things...
the member who spread that fake information i already identified him ...
he is from a private team which bought the full hack of Irdeto,
and they created a private business to sold binaries locked to a specific CAID: 06xx
for simple users Or payservers.....etc
i will not give precious informations like : their countries, names, ...etc
and the main and big problem for them was when i succeeded to make M7 working
they didn't like it and they became crazy because they know that their business will be in doubt
because binaries are for free ...etc
So to react, they decided spread fake information about stealing DATA with my oscam
to make users in doubt and continue their activity(means: continue making more Dollars)
Finally, trust or not trust that will be your problem ...
Greetings,
@ohmza Do you trust whatever written on the net ?
I'll explain to you once forever and clarify things...
the member who spread that fake information i already identified him ...
he is from a private team which bought the full hack of Irdeto,
and they created a private business to sold binaries locked to a specific CAID: 06xx
for simple users Or payservers.....etc
i will not give precious informations like : their countries, names, ...etc
and the main and big problem for them was when i succeeded to make M7 working
they didn't like it and they became crazy because they know that their business will be in doubt
because binaries are for free ...etc
So to react, they decided spread fake information about stealing DATA with my oscam
to make users in doubt and continue their activity(means: continue making more Dollars)
Finally, trust or not trust that will be your problem ...
Greetings,
karlo.e
Member ++
the Grimm brothers would envy you 
I also have the experience that your oscam calls home - or to one Czech IP, but I don't use your oscam because it's full of bugs and it's only for 0624, even though you've been trying for Austriasat for a month and figuring out how the pairing works..
But people aren't stupid and won't give their private data to some private close project parasitic on that open source oscam.
Well, all you have left is a Croatian-Austrian user B**y and a German-Dutch user TV-G***er for a collection data..
I also have the experience that your oscam calls home - or to one Czech IP, but I don't use your oscam because it's full of bugs and it's only for 0624, even though you've been trying for Austriasat for a month and figuring out how the pairing works..
But people aren't stupid and won't give their private data to some private close project parasitic on that open source oscam.
Well, all you have left is a Croatian-Austrian user B**y and a German-Dutch user TV-G***er for a collection data..
Last edited:
@karlo.e
So, continue bought private binaries locked to a specific CAID with some restrictions like:
* You can use only one reader(1 card) in those buggy private binaries.
* You can not share more than 2 channels(which you call surflock but it's not).
* Crash of the Cards with mode ICE/Irdeto when initial the card with those buggy private binaries
and the solution given to the users was : restart oscam on every crash ...
* ....etc
####
Example: last year in private i had seen a binary with keys of DIGI TURK sold 400 euro .
and here in the forum there are members who bought private binaries
but they will not say it here in public because they consider that is shame but they accept ...
;
So, continue bought private binaries locked to a specific CAID with some restrictions like:
* You can use only one reader(1 card) in those buggy private binaries.
* You can not share more than 2 channels(which you call surflock but it's not).
* Crash of the Cards with mode ICE/Irdeto when initial the card with those buggy private binaries
and the solution given to the users was : restart oscam on every crash ...
* ....etc
####
Example: last year in private i had seen a binary with keys of DIGI TURK sold 400 euro .
and here in the forum there are members who bought private binaries
but they will not say it here in public because they consider that is shame but they accept ...
;
I think you will be angry because After your reply here
I got private data and logs from someone which didn't like your post and he told me
do what you want with my data , just continue your project ...
Thanks,
@karlo.e First of all, TV-G***er doesn't use @rumas oscam for L2B anymore. Which one that he is currently using? I will leave you to make a guess.
Second, to end a Czech ip address controversy, I think you need to run @rumas oscam and type "netstat -na" on terminal and look at UDP part then see whether there is 172.5.20.1 or 84.19. or not. Maybe you can show the output here.
Second, to end a Czech ip address controversy, I think you need to run @rumas oscam and type "netstat -na" on terminal and look at UDP part then see whether there is 172.5.20.1 or 84.19. or not. Maybe you can show the output here.
Last edited by a moderator:
@ohmza
when they spread that fake information i was obliged to prove that they are not right
by adding an 'auto log' of a compiled binary ending with SHA256 (i think you know what it means SHA256 ...)
Tell me where can be the backdoor in this log especially when the compilation ended with: SHA256
...;
when they spread that fake information i was obliged to prove that they are not right
by adding an 'auto log' of a compiled binary ending with SHA256 (i think you know what it means SHA256 ...)
so, i'm confused here ... is it possible to have a backdoor like they said those assholes ..?
Tell me where can be the backdoor in this log especially when the compilation ended with: SHA256
...;
You wrote that you want to explain something and instead of it you write fake informations here. Irdeto with L2B init was not bought by anyone, it was a by-product of 3 months playing with irdeto cards in 2017 year and that VF - karlo-e guy about which you wrote has nothing to do with it : )
truefrnd
Member
i have pairingid . i cant pm
truefrnd
Member
what problemsierra you have everything except money.. and of course you want everything..
you fogo
truefrnd
Member
@ohmza why you writing here ,if its personal then contact him PM@karlo.e First of all, TV-G***er doesn't use @rumas oscam for L2B anymore. Which one that he is currently using? I will leave you to make a guess.
Second, to end a Czech ip address controversy, I think you need to run @rumas oscam and type "netstat -na" on terminal and look at UDP part then see whether there is 172.105.20.139 or 84.19.76.119 or not. Maybe you can show the output here.
I am writing here to encourage everyone to have a caution in mind before running any closed source oscam. I have said it clearly on the comment that was already deleted by mods that it is up to you all to make a final decision whether you want to run that closed source oscam or not.
me too, i can't send PM's
Maybe, come to another forum where everything is not closed up.
Thanks,
karlo.e
Member ++
you're right.. in closed source you don't know what the author (rumas aka samur) could compile.. even remote access, etc etc .. therefore, be careful with rumas's binaries or MohamedOs binaries as well
But that can be easily proved, isn’t it? Just log the network traffic when you run those binaries, and you’ll see everything. So far, both sides are not be able to provide such proof yet.