Ford vehicles lead MOT failures

DiamondGeezer

VIP Member
VIP Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
3,002
Reaction score
166
Location
Bangalore
MOT failure rates for cars and small vans have been published for the first time following a Freedom of Information (FoI) request by the BBC.

For vehicles first used in 2004, Ford Transit Connect had the highest failure rate at 30.5%, followed by the Renault Megane at 28.1% and the Ford Transit.

The Toyota Corolla had the lowest failure rate with just 11.2%.

The Vehicle and Operator Services Agency had resisted publishing the data, saying it might be misleading.

The MOT is the annual test of roadworthiness that all cars and vans must pass once they are three years old.

The data relates to MOT tests carried out in 2007 and is available on the VOSA website as a PDF document consisting of 1,200 pages.

VOSA had also argued that publication would breach the commercial confidentiality of the manufacturers.

But publication was ordered by the Information Commissioner in December, who said that disclosure of the information was in the public interest.

In order to make it more digestible, Martin Rosenbaum, the BBC's FoI specialist, who pressed for the data to be made public, has converted the data into an

.
It shows pass and failure rates for cars and vans, by make, model, year of first use, and gives the general reason for each failure, such as being due to the vehicle's body and structure, brakes, the driver's view of the road, or problems with the fuel system or exhaust

VOSA has said it will publish statistics for 2008 and 2009 later this year, and then each year in the future.

There are some clear patterns here and certainly some Japanese models seem to do very well," said Mr Rosenbaum.

"We've got Hondas, Toyotas but not just those; Ford Fiestas and VW Polos - there are a number of cars that seem to do well."

High mileage

The crucial information that was not made available is the mileage of the car, or an assessment of how well it has been looked after by the owner, both of which will have a direct bearing on a vehicle's condition and its ability to pass an MOT test.

A number of Vauxhall cars appear toward the top of the list for failures among cars that were just three years old.

"Many of the failed items highlighted in this report, such as brakes, driver's view of the road, registration plates and tyres, are directly attributable to vehicles that have covered above average mileages," said a Vauxhall spokesman.

"Since Vauxhall was one of the largest suppliers of fleet vehicles during the period surveyed (2004-2007), and fleet vehicles typically cover higher mileages than most, it comes as no surprise that some of our cars appear in this list."

'Amazing'

The publication of the MOT data was welcomed by John Glynn of Glass's Guide, the well-known industry guide to used car prices.

"It's an amazing collection of facts and figures," he said.

"But I'm not sure it portrays the correct position because of the high number of small items that can lead to an MOT failure."

Mr Glynn pointed out that many owners, particularly those of workhorse vans, typically combine their tests with an annual service.

The MOT takes place first, the service corrects any faults that are found, and the vehicle is then re-tested and passes the MOT later the same day.

"I'm quite surprised at some of the high failure rates, such as the Rover 420," he said.

Kieren Puffett, editor of Parker's Guide, agreed that the information was a good cross-reference to the reputation of cars' reliability.

"This shows the importance of MOTs picking up if cars have faults and problems. They provide a safety net to see if cars are up to the job," he said.

He said further details about the reasons for failures, and mileage levels, would prove useful.

BBC News - Ford leads in MOT failures as figures are revealed
 
Renault 5

Year of Test Test
First Use Passes Failures

1976 1 1


who's got the other 76 one then, I thought I had the oldest and only one
 
bet this test isnt done by equal numbers though. theres more fords out there than hondas ect.. so there will be more failure rates in the system based purely on numbers.

id like to see 5000 ford numbers and 5000 hondas, 5000 fiats ect.... this info posted is an overall number from the database. more models from a certain make will result in more failures.

and as stated there so many things that could be a fail, for example a lot of one make may have had brake lights outs causing a fail yet another brand might be a fooker for brake lines rotting. i wouldnt buy a brand based on these stats as id rather have a car with an odd brake light failure over a car that is known to have a brake line rotting problem.

im not saying ford, vaux are better than honda, fiat ect... but this survey wont be accurate.
 
Last edited:
bet this test isnt done by equal numbers though. theres more fords out there than hondas ect.. so there will be more failure rates in the system based purely on numbers.

Sorry, but your maths are dodgy. The figures deal with percentages, not total numbers.
 
bet this test isnt done by equal numbers though. theres more fords out there than hondas ect.. so there will be more failure rates in the system based purely on numbers.

id like to see 5000 ford numbers and 5000 hondas, 5000 fiats ect.... this info posted is an overall number from the database. more models from a certain make will result in more failures.

and as stated there so many things that could be a fail, for example a lot of one make may have had brake lights outs causing a fail yet another brand might be a fooker for brake lines rotting. i wouldnt buy a brand based on these stats as id rather have a car with an odd brake light failure over a car that is known to have a brake line rotting problem.

im not saying ford, vaux are better than honda, fiat ect... but this survey wont be accurate.

Yep these surveys are usually all over the place and tbh i think Ford have been producing good cars over the last 10yrs.
In the 80s they produced junk but at the end of the 90s they were getting better and now they produce well built cars.

The company i used to work for built the interior components for Ford,Vauxhall and Fiat and many others and the ford parts were always better quality as they shared many components with Aston Martin and Jaguar.
Fiat (Fix It Again Tomorrow)however was a total joke and made out of dog meat.
Ive never seen such flimsy bits put into a car that frankly i wouldnt put in a scaletrix car.
 
Sorry, but your maths are dodgy. The figures deal with percentages, not total numbers.

well im sorry but heres a percentage for you 99% of your posts are one liners posted purely to get on the wrong side of people.

superiority complex some might call it.

hence why you was on my blocked list, i see i made a mistake clearing it and thats not because of replies to me its most of your replies, blocking is better than biting my tongue.

reapplying it right now.
 
well im sorry but heres a percentage for you 99% of your posts are one liners posted purely to get on the wrong side of people.

superiority complex some might call it.

Im sorry if you don't understand basic maths and statistics. There's no need to be offensive about it.
 
well im sorry but heres a percentage for you 99% of your posts are one liners posted purely to get on the wrong side of people.

superiority complex some might call it.

hence why you was on my blocked list, i see i made a mistake clearing it and thats not because of replies to me its most of your replies, blocking is better than biting my tongue.

reapplying it right now.

LMAO Thommo, I just checked the database and nara's MOT ran out some time ago. He's been spitting out nothing but toxic garbage for a while now, time for the scrap heap me thinks.
 
This info should have been published years ago. The amount of cars tested is irrelevant Thommo wether they test 10 or 10,000 the percentage will stay the same. What you need though is the reasons for failure are they minor or major defects. The ford transit covers high milages, a large percentage of their failures could be tyres, not really anything to do with the manufacturer use is more a factor there.

thebigman
 
LMAO Thommo, I just checked the database and nara's MOT ran out some time ago. He's been spitting out nothing but toxic garbage for a while now, time for the scrap heap me thinks.

Join the club.
 
LMAO Thommo, I just checked the database and nara's MOT ran out some time ago. He's been spitting out nothing but toxic garbage for a while now, time for the scrap heap me thinks.

:roflmao: class
 
I wonder if mine was on it, ford mondeo 150K on the clock and fails as one of the tyre was on the wrong way round.
 
Back
Top