How is this acceptable?

Spectre

Administrator
Staff member
Jnr Admin
Joined
Jun 3, 2001
Messages
41,222
Reaction score
5,596
Location
Airstrip One
Delingpole: Corbyn's Red-Green Watermelon Terror Could Soon Engulf UK

Labour MP and Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer John McDonnell with a backdrop of Communists and various socialim enthusiasts (Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao).

Stalin and Mao were genocidal mass-murderers.

I think a couple of people have been missed off that poster, Pol Pot and Adolf Hitler.
 
Last edited:
How is this acceptable?
...It's not horrible post..lol
 
I think they're trying to show socialism, lenin/stalin/mao et al were all massive socialists, and i'd guess that is what that poster is trying to show.

Im neither a left or right, imho they both have their own problems. Is the poster no different to Tommy Robinson/Britain First propaganda? It's just a shame that they're trying to say this whole thing is about politics, when it's actually about race supremacy.
 
I hope everyone noticed that @nara sidestepped the actual issue.

I was more worried about your questionable reading matter than I was about the issue tbh. Breitbart is a pretty toxic source

As for the issue...janobi asked the question:

Is the poster no different to Tommy Robinson/Britain First propaganda?


My answer would be no. Though Breitbart might not agree, they seem to rather like Tommy.
 
Because it exposes Labour?

No. It's just propoganda to fool working class people to vote against the one man that may actually improve poor peoples living standards.

It seems to be working.
 
No. It's just propoganda to fool working class people to vote against the one man that may actually improve poor peoples living standards.

It seems to be working.

Why would Corbyn want to improve living standards? Labour need to keep their electorate suppressed, that's how it works.
 
No. It's just propoganda to fool working class people to vote against the one man that may actually improve poor peoples living standards.

It seems to be working.

Personally I dont see Corbyn ever being elected. They're too far left for the majority of people in the UK, and if they did get into power they would punish the higher earners of society. I saw they want to renationalise the water companies for like 24 Billion, which is massively under market value. It's a pie in the sky idea tbh, and will never happen.

Coming from Wales, it's a massive Labour stronghold, and always will be. My whole family voted Labour all their lives, and I was encouraged to do the same. Sadly I cannot vote labour as they would punish me financially due to the higher tax rate, but I cannot vote Conservative due to the beliefs I had installed upon me growing up (Thatcher Government).
 
Sadly I cannot vote labour as they would punish me financially due to the higher tax rate, but I cannot vote Conservative due to the beliefs I had installed upon me growing up (Thatcher Government).

From an ideological perspective I'd love to vote for Labour but they their taxation policy doesn't work for me either. People tend to vote with their wallet.

What I can't understand is why poor people vote Tory or any other right wing party. I thought that money stumps racism but apparently not. Due to massive underinvestment in education we have people believing that the BBC, The Standard, The Express and Brietbart are extreme left wing institutions. The same people also believe that Jezza is a racist war mongering terrorist lily livered pacifist.
 
From an ideological perspective I'd love to vote for Labour but they their taxation policy doesn't work for me either. People tend to vote with their wallet.

What I can't understand is why poor people vote Tory or any other right wing party. I thought that money stumps racism but apparently not. Due to massive underinvestment in education we have people believing that the BBC, The Standard, The Express and Brietbart are extreme left wing institutions. The same people also believe that Jezza is a racist war mongering terrorist lily livered pacifist.

LMAO

You have to be trolling, shrooming, or both.

Anyway, I think the thread has veered somewhat from politicians having posters of mass murderers behind them.
 
LMAO

You have to be trolling, shrooming, or both.

Anyway, I think the thread has veered somewhat from politicians having posters of mass murderers behind them.

Some valid points made there in direct response to stuff that you've written, a lot of which was unsubstantiated nonsense.
 
Sorry but pretty much all of it. Your lefts and rights are all mixed up and that stuff about Labour needing to keep its voters surpressed, whats that all about! Surpess who, what, why, c'mon...
 
Sorry but pretty much all of it. Your lefts and rights are all mixed up and that stuff about Labour needing to keep its voters surpressed, whats that all about! Surpess who, what, why, c'mon...

Labour keeps a welfare dependent voter base, that's how it works. Public sector workers are brainwashed into Labour and Lib Dem.

Where are my right and left mixed up exactly?
 
Labour keeps a welfare dependent voter base, that's how it works. Public sector workers are brainwashed into Labour and Lib Dem.

Where are my right and left mixed up exactly?

I wouldn't say they keep a welfare dependent voter base. But they're certainly more generous to the "welfare state".
 
Your last statement on the welfare state and public sector workers is one of complete fantasy, prove it!

Your lefts and rights are completely mixed up. Brietbart is a far right news agency.

Must admit I am wondering how far to the right you must be to think that the news agencies you listed in post three are considered lefist. It's concerning...
 
Back
Top