The new SVN login details should be available by tuesday evening at the latest
this was the list of things sent to iQ to get sorted out, i did point out that youtube and iPlayer were nothing to do with the image itself
as you can tell, i didnt write it lol
but, now for the request, and some input from admin, especially mick would be a big help
in August, What satellite magazine will be reviewing the TM800, i dont know if that means reviewing it in august for the september magazine, or reviewing it in the next few weeks for the august magazine, i think its for the august mag, but anyway, during some VERY long phonecalls, ive been asked if i could produce an image like the last few DW releases to send to wotsat to review the receiver with
however, this is a double edged sword
ideally, to create the best image, needs to be done at SVN level, and looking at the last 3 images, i could get one done once ive downloaded the SVN in a couple of hours, this is one thing thats guaranteed the SVN will be open by tuesday evening, Richard is going away for 10 days on wednesday morning
Now things are finally moving in the right direction, ill take a look at everything again, i know itll be in the same sort of state as when it was UR, as i know iQ are also creating images for other receivers that UR team was creating images for, but, these other receivers have also had a lot of things sorted out in the last 2 weeks as well, and if it is all laid out the same as the UR SVN, ill know my way round it straight off
Why i want some input from admin though, is that wotsat will be testing and reviewing the receiver, based on the image they load onto it (a BIG risk if you ask me lol) now i can make the image, with all of the usual DW EPG goodies and fixes, but, as ive read wotsat for so many years, i also know that thisll be the FIRST time theyve had a receiver that has a full EPG thats not an official receiver straight from the flashing, which has also been commented on with all other receivers.
wotsat goes out all over europe, and has quite a big following in the UK, so if i DW brand this image like i have with all the others, itll possibly have quite a large influx of new members who google 'digitalworldz' as wotsat generally also give credit to the image makers whose images they use on their test receivers
Is something that admin would want? I'd like to DW-ise the image for the magazine, but i know that in the past when quite big 'publicity' things have had a chance theyve generally been shyed away from. please have a think / discussion about the possible benefits of lots of new members to the sat sections, or the possible implications of suddenly everyone wondering who DW actually are and maybe looking into things
this was the list of things sent to iQ to get sorted out, i did point out that youtube and iPlayer were nothing to do with the image itself
as you can tell, i didnt write it lol
but, now for the request, and some input from admin, especially mick would be a big help
in August, What satellite magazine will be reviewing the TM800, i dont know if that means reviewing it in august for the september magazine, or reviewing it in the next few weeks for the august magazine, i think its for the august mag, but anyway, during some VERY long phonecalls, ive been asked if i could produce an image like the last few DW releases to send to wotsat to review the receiver with
however, this is a double edged sword
ideally, to create the best image, needs to be done at SVN level, and looking at the last 3 images, i could get one done once ive downloaded the SVN in a couple of hours, this is one thing thats guaranteed the SVN will be open by tuesday evening, Richard is going away for 10 days on wednesday morning
Now things are finally moving in the right direction, ill take a look at everything again, i know itll be in the same sort of state as when it was UR, as i know iQ are also creating images for other receivers that UR team was creating images for, but, these other receivers have also had a lot of things sorted out in the last 2 weeks as well, and if it is all laid out the same as the UR SVN, ill know my way round it straight off
Why i want some input from admin though, is that wotsat will be testing and reviewing the receiver, based on the image they load onto it (a BIG risk if you ask me lol) now i can make the image, with all of the usual DW EPG goodies and fixes, but, as ive read wotsat for so many years, i also know that thisll be the FIRST time theyve had a receiver that has a full EPG thats not an official receiver straight from the flashing, which has also been commented on with all other receivers.
wotsat goes out all over europe, and has quite a big following in the UK, so if i DW brand this image like i have with all the others, itll possibly have quite a large influx of new members who google 'digitalworldz' as wotsat generally also give credit to the image makers whose images they use on their test receivers
Is something that admin would want? I'd like to DW-ise the image for the magazine, but i know that in the past when quite big 'publicity' things have had a chance theyve generally been shyed away from. please have a think / discussion about the possible benefits of lots of new members to the sat sections, or the possible implications of suddenly everyone wondering who DW actually are and maybe looking into things
no changelog though, still the same one from UR dated 02/11
