NASA's Hubble Rules Out One Alternative to Dark Energy

fireblade

Elite Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
2,565
Reaction score
511
It looks like dark energy may be here to stay. In refining the expansion rate of the universe to unprecedented accuracy, astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have also ruled out an alternative to this mysterious, invisible source of repulsive gravity, which makes the universe appear to expand ever faster.

hs-2011-08-a-thumb.jpg


If dark energy seems like a mind-boggling concept, then the competing model that astronomers have eliminated is equally as fantastic. The alternative hypothesis proposed that an enormous bubble of relatively empty space eight billion light-years across surrounds our galactic neighborhood. If we lived in the center of this void, then observations of galaxies being pushed away from each other at accelerating speeds would be just an illusion.

The simplest form of this hypothesis has now been kicked out because astronomers have placed even tighter constraints on the universe's present expansion rate. The Hubble observations, conducted by the SHOES (Supernova H0 for the Equation of State) team and led by Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., helped refine the universe's current expansion rate to an uncertainty of just 3.3 percent. The new measurement reduces the error margin by 30 percent over the previous best Hubble measurement made in 2009.

The value for the expansion rate is 73.8 kilometers per second per megaparsec. It means that for every additional million parsecs (3.26 million light-years) a galaxy is from Earth, the galaxy appears to be traveling 73.8 kilometers per second faster away from us.

Every decrease in uncertainty of the universe's expansion rate helps solidify our understanding of its cosmic ingredients. Knowing the precise value of the universe's expansion rate further restricts the range of dark energy's strength and also helps astronomers tighten up a number of other cosmic properties, including the universe's shape and its roster of neutrinos, ghostly particles that filled the early universe.

"We are using the new camera on Hubble like a policeman's radar gun to catch the universe speeding," Riess said. "It looks like it's dark energy that's pressing on the gas pedal."

Riess' results appear in the April 1 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.

Bursting the bubble

Dark energy is one of the greatest cosmological mysteries in modern physics. Even Albert Einstein conceived of a repulsive force, called the cosmological constant, which would counter gravity and keep the universe stable. He abandoned the idea when astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered in 1929 that the universe is expanding. Observational evidence for dark energy didn't come along until 1998, when two teams of researchers (one, in a study led by Riess) discovered it.

The idea of dark energy was so far-fetched, many scientists began contemplating other strange interpretations, including the cosmic bubble theory. In this theory, the lower-density bubble would expand faster than the more massive universe around it. To an observer inside the bubble, it would appear that a dark-energy-like force was pushing the entire universe apart. The bubble hypothesis requires that the universe's expansion rate be much slower than astronomers have calculated, about 60 to 65 kilometers per second per megaparsec. By reducing the uncertainty of the Hubble constant's value to 3.3 percent, Riess reports that his team has eliminated beyond all reasonable doubt the possibility of that lower number.

"The hardest part of the bubble theory to accept was that it required us to live very near the center of such an empty region of space," explained Lucas Macri, of Texas A&M University in College Station, a key collaborator of Riess'. "This has about a one in a million chance of occurring. But since we know that something weird is making the universe accelerate, it's better to let the data be our guide."

Using stars as "cosmic yardsticks"

Measuring the universe's expansion rate is a tricky business. Riess' team first had to determine accurate distances to galaxies both near and far from Earth. The team compared those distances with the rate of their apparent recessional speeds caused by the expansion of space. They then used those two values to calculate the Hubble constant. Since astronomers cannot physically measure the distances to galaxies, the researchers had to find stars or other objects that serve as reliable cosmic yardsticks to galaxies. These are objects whose intrinsic brightness is known. Their distances, therefore, can be inferred by comparing their true brightness with their apparent brightness as seen from Earth.

Among the most reliable of these cosmic yardsticks for relatively shorter distances are Cepheid variables, pulsating stars that dim and fade at rates that correspond to their intrinsic luminosity. But Cepheids are too dim to be found in very distant galaxies. For longer distances, Riess' team chose a special class of exploding stars called Type Ia supernovae. These stellar explosions all flare with similar luminosity and are brilliant enough to be seen far across the universe.

Riess narrowed the Hubble constant's error margin by using a number of refinements to streamline and strengthen the construction of the cosmic "distance ladder" to faraway space. His team searched for nearby galaxies that contained both Cepheid stars and a recent Type Ia supernova, a very rare occurrence. By comparing the apparent brightness of both types of stars, the astronomers could then accurately measure their intrinsic brightness and therefore calculate distances to Type Ia supernovae in far-flung galaxies.

They used the sharpness of the new Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) to study stars in visible and near-infrared light, studying over 600 Cepheid variables, more than half of them for the first time. The team also measured more galaxies containing Cepheids and Type Ia supernovae than Riess' previous Hubble study. Many of the Cepheids were spied in infrared light, which cuts through the dust enveloping them, yielding a more accurate measure of their true distance.

By using just one instrument, WFC3, to bridge the rungs in the distance ladder, Riess' team eliminated the systematic errors that are almost unavoidably introduced by comparing measurements from different telescopes. Using one instrument to measure the Hubble constant is like measuring a hallway with a tape measure instead of by laying a ruler from end to end. By avoiding the need to pick up the ruler and lay it back down, you can prevent mistakes. "The camera on Hubble, WFC3, is the best ever flown on Hubble for making these measurements, improving the precision of prior measurements in a small fraction of the time it previously took," Riess said.

The astronomer hopes that Hubble will continue to be used in this way to reduce the uncertainty in the Hubble constant even more, and thus refine the measured properties of dark energy. He suggests the present uncertainty could be cut in two before Hubble gives way to improvements out of Hubble's reach but within the scope of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), an infrared observatory scheduled to launch later this decade.

Chasing a runaway universe

Riess has been pursuing dark energy for 13 years. He co-discovered the existence of dark energy by finding that distant Type Ia supernovae were dimmer than expected, which meant they were farther away than anticipated. The only way for that to happen, Riess realized, was if the expansion of the universe had sped up some time in the past.

Until that discovery, astronomers had generally believed that the cosmic expansion was gradually slowing down, due to the gravitational tugs that individual galaxies exert on one another. But the results implied that some mysterious force was acting against the pull of gravity, shoving galaxies away from each other at ever-increasing speeds.

Riess decided that one of the best ways to tighten the constraints on dark energy is to determine an accurate value for the Hubble constant, which he has been doing with the Hubble Space Telescope. That measurement, combined with others from NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), traces the universe's behavior from nearly the dawn of time to the present age. (WMAP showed the universe as it appeared shortly after the Big Bang, before stars and galaxies formed.)

Riess is just one of many astronomers who, over the past 80 years, have been measuring and re-measuring the Hubble constant. The Hubble telescope has played a major role in helping astronomers precisely measure the universe's expansion. Before Hubble was launched in 1990, the estimates for the Hubble constant varied by a factor of two. In 1999, the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale refined the value of the Hubble constant to an error of about 10 percent.

HubbleSite - NewsCenter - NASA's Hubble Rules Out One Alternative to Dark Energy (03/14/2011) - The Full Story

regards fireblade
 
Back
Top