Tech News UK to stop downloading from illegal sites

gonzoarsenal

Inactive User
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
After years of wrangling, a deal between entertainment industry bodies and UK internet service providers to help combat piracy is imminent.

BT, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media will send "educational" letters to customers believed to be downloading illegally.

But a document seen by the BBC shows that rights holders are set to make do with considerably weaker measures than originally asked for.

The first letters - known as "alerts" - are expected to be sent out in 2015.

The deal has been struck with the BPI, which represents the British music industry, and the Motion Picture Association (MPA), which covers film.

The bodies had originally suggested the letters should tell repeat infringers about possible punitive measures.

They also wanted access to a database of known illegal downloaders, opening the possibility of further legal action against individuals.

However, following almost four years of debate between the two sides, the final draft of the Voluntary Copyright Alert Programme (Vcap) contains neither of those key measures.

Softened

Instead, letters sent to suspected infringers must be "educational" in tone, "promoting an increase in awareness" of legal downloading services.

The rights holders have agreed to pay £750,000 towards each internet service provider (ISP) to set up the system, or 75% of the total costs, whichever is smaller.

A further £75,000 (or 75% of total costs) will be paid each year to cover administration costs.

The BBC understands the UK's remaining ISPs are likely to join the agreement at a later stage.

It is expected that the deal will be finalised pending approval from the Information Commissioner's Office regarding the collection of data about which customers receive alerts.

A record of which accounts had received alerts, and how many, will be kept on file by the ISPs for up to a year.

The rights holders will receive a monthly break down of how many alerts have been sent out, but only the ISPs will know the identities of the customers involved.

A cap for the total number of alerts that can be sent out per year has also been set.

Between the four ISPS, no more than 2.5 million alerts can be sent out. As and when other ISPs join the agreement, this cap will be adjusted.

A maximum of four alerts - by either email or physical letter - can be sent to an individual customer account. Language will "escalate in severity" - but will not contain threats or talk of consequences for the accused users.

After four alerts, no further action will be taken by the ISPs.

Bitter argument

When it comes to piracy, the two sides have been locked - with the government playing occasional mediator - in discussion since the controversial introduction of the Digital Economy Act in 2010.

Enacted just before the end of the last Labour government, the DEA included various measures to deal with copyrighted infringement including, but not limited to, cutting off repeat offenders from the internet.

But ISPs, and various internet rights groups, put up vocal opposition - arguing that it would force ISPs to police their users, while raising questions about whether internet access should be considered a human right.

In response to frustration from content industries that the measures were taking too long to enforce, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport suggested that a voluntary agreement be put forward.

But as recently as September 2013, the proposals were described as "unworkable" by ISPs, and so the final draft required considerable compromise, mostly on the part of the content industry groups.

In a joint statement, the BPI and MPA said: "Content creators and ISPs, with the support of government, have been exploring the possibility of developing an awareness programme that will support the continuing growth of legal creative content services, reduce copyright infringement and create the best possible customer experience online."

The groups declined to comment specifically on the leaked document. The four ISPs involved all confirmed that they were in discussion.

In the meantime, the content creators have been successful in having more than 40 websites blocked so that users in the UK could not reach them unless using technical workarounds.

The alert system is planned to run for three years - with regular reviews on its effectiveness.

In the agreement, it states that an ineffective system would lead rights holders to call for "rapid implementation" of stronger measures as outlined in the Digital Economy Act.

On the new plans, a source close to the discussions told the BBC: "The rights holders have accepted they can't use this process to go after individuals.

"The ISPs have insisted that already established, legal routes are used in that scenario. Instead, the purpose of any campaign will be to inform and raise awareness rather than punitive action."

Source: BBC News - Deal to combat piracy in UK with 'alerts' is imminent
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ffs what next concentration camps for RGHing ya frakin xbox bloody nazis
 
i thought it seemed a good outcome, 4 warning letters then it gets dropped. Thanks very much for the heads up but no thanks haha
 
How exactly are they gonna monitor this lol ?

Lets all stand up against the wall now lol i dont think me personally there is one person who has not downloaded illegally in this country if you want me to be honest within the circle of people i know they all download and friends of friends do too its never ending.So good luck i don't need educating arse holes
 
Reckon we should run a competition to see who can get four free firelighters the fastest ;)
 
Easy to get around this via varios proxy software
 
as long as they don't charge an admin fee per letter,
they can send them till their hearts content... :)
 
BT have actually blocked a shed load of sites, best way around this is to use a proxy like Hide My A*s or something similar. It's also got for hopping in and out of different countries which are region locked as well and allows you to use Hulu etc:)
 
I suppose it depends on where the VPN provider is based i.e. whether it is subject to US law or in a pro-US country.

Anyway, it's the function of the VPN to encrypt traffic point-to-point really, it's the proxy at the other end that provides anonymity. As soon as the VPN terminates (at the perimeter of the provider network) the data becomes readable again.

Simply put, Hidemyass can see what you're attempting to do and, being pro-US, are likely to pass on details.

There are a number of ways around this but little point in discussing in detail here as they tend to operate fine until they're out in the public domain then someone blocks them lol

In general though there's probably little point changing ISP as they work in tiers so a small ISP usually buys bandwidth in bulk from a larger one i.e. you'd get blocked by the larger one anyway! So, use the VPN to surf anonymously and check out small search engines that are less likely to filter content - you want the results 'raw'.

Use the search engine to look for ways around the Internet that are not so well known like Tor (example, not recommendation) then slip on down to the underground ;)
 
I suppose it depends on where the VPN provider is based i.e. whether it is subject to US law or in a pro-US country.

Anyway, it's the function of the VPN to encrypt traffic point-to-point really, it's the proxy at the other end that provides anonymity. As soon as the VPN terminates (at the perimeter of the provider network) the data becomes readable again.

Simply put, Hidemyass can see what you're attempting to do and, being pro-US, are likely to pass on details.

There are a number of ways around this but little point in discussing in detail here as they tend to operate fine until they're out in the public domain then someone blocks them lol

In general though there's probably little point changing ISP as they work in tiers so a small ISP usually buys bandwidth in bulk from a larger one i.e. you'd get blocked by the larger one anyway! So, use the VPN to surf anonymously and check out small search engines that are less likely to filter content - you want the results 'raw'.

Use the search engine to look for ways around the Internet that are not so well known like Tor (example, not recommendation) then slip on down to the underground ;)

Are they going to be monitoring this on a port base? Or do you think they'll be interrogating actual packets of data?
 
I would guess they'll monitor ports, hosts and IP addresses, I would and easily scripted to flag up concerns.
 


This Is How The UK Piracy Warnings Will Work*


Last week news broke that UK ISPs are teaming up with copyright holders to notify Internet subscribers caught sharing pirated material. The plan has been widely covered in the media, but unfortunately fact and fiction are often intertwined. So how scary are these piracy warnings really? Let's find out.

In an effort to curb online piracy, the movie and music industries have reached an agreement with the UK’s leading ISPs to send warnings to alleged copyright infringers.

Thus far details on the proposed system have been scarce, leading to the wildest assumptions and in some cases a core misunderstanding of how the process will work.

Earlier this week, for example, the CEO of a smaller UK Internet provider said that he will refuse to join the program as ISPs shouldn’t be compelled to monitor everything their customers do. Others fear that they may receive a warning for downloading an MP3 from a file-hosting site, or for streaming a copyrighted YouTube video.

All of the above have nothing to do with the proposed measures.

To clear up some of the confusion TorrentFreak spoke to a source closely involved in the Vcap system. We were informed that Vcap will be part of a larger campaign to inform the public about copyright issues. For this reason, the warnings, or alerts rather, will focus on educating people about how they can access content legally, much like the scheme currently operating in the U.S.

The four ISPs who are confirmed to be involved in Vcap are BT, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media, but other providers could join in at a later stage. Below we have summarized how the Vcap program is expected to work, including several new details.
What will be monitored?

According to information obtained by TorrentFreak the Vcap system will only apply to P2P file-sharing. In theory this means that the focus will be almost exclusively on BitTorrent, as other P2P networks have relatively low user bases.

Consequently, those who use Usenet providers or file-hosting services such as 4Shared, RapidShare and Hotfile are not at risk. The same is true for those who use streaming sites. In other words, the Vcap program only covers part of all online piracy.
Will all P2P file-sharers receive a warning?

TorrentFreak has learned that not all P2P file-sharers will receive a warning. The system will focus on people whose Internet accounts have been used to share copyrighted material more than once. This is different from the U.S. model where people get an alert after the first offense.

The focus on repeat infringers is a logical choice since there are millions of file-sharers in the UK and the copyright holders and ISPs have agreed to cap the warnings at 2.5 million over three years.
Who will be monitoring these copyright infringements?

While ISPs take part in the scheme, they will not monitor subscribers’ file-sharing activities. The tracking will be done by a third party company. The most likely candidate is MarkMonitor (Dtecnet) who are also the technology partner for the U.S. Copyright Alert System.

This tracking company collects IP-addresses from BitTorrent swarms and sends its findings directly to the Internet providers. The lists with infringing IP-addresses are not shared with the record labels, movie studios or other third parties.

Each ISP will keep a database of the alleged infringers and send them appropriate warnings. If the ISPs get approval from the Information Commissioner’s Office, recorded infringements will be stored for a year after which they will be deleted.
Will any Internet accounts be disconnected?

There are no disconnections or mitigation measures for repeat infringers under the Vcap program. Alleged file-sharers will get up to four warnings and all subsequent offenses will be ignored.

The source we spoke with clarified that it’s not the intention of Vcap to stop the most hardcore file-sharers. The program is mostly focused on educating casual infringers about the legal alternatives to piracy.
Can the monitoring be circumvented?

The answer to the previous questions already shows that users have plenty of options to bypass the program. They can simply switch to other means of downloading, but there are more alternatives.

BitTorrent users could hide their IP-addresses through proxy services and VPNs for example. After the U.S. Copyright Alert Program launched last year there was a huge increase in demand for these kind of anonymity services.
So how scary is the Vcap anti-piracy plan?

While we can’t say anything too conclusive, it appears that the main purpose is to inform casual infringers about their inappropriate behavior. The focus lies on education, although the warnings also serve as a deterrent by pointing out that people are not anonymous. For some this may be enough to switch to legal alternatives.

All in all the proposed measures are fairly reasonable, especially compared to other countries where fines and internet connections are on the table. Whether it will be successful is an entirely different question of course, and one which will only be answered when the first results come in.

Finally, it’s worth noting that if Vcap fails it’s not automatically a win for the pirates. A few months ago the Government promised to “bring the Digital Economy Act into force as soon as practicable,” which will result in more stringent anti-piracy measures.
 
Back
Top