I hear you and have to say i am undecided and apparently the child can Over rule and take the vaccine anyway which sounds a bit crazy to me , parental responsibility must play a a part?I definitely won’t be letting my son have it, the stats show that health under 40’s are more at risk from the vaccine than the jab.
the JVCI said no so this is political not science and how can a child make a decision like that, parental responsibility must be upheld or this is a slippery slope.
This is still an experimental vaccine, this has not been tested properly for kids or adults so we have no idea what the consequences are longer term (I am double jabbed before getting accused for being anti vac’s and son is up to date on all other jabs)
That’s where I differ, I don’t see both sides when it’s the kids.It has to be personal choice but do se both sides of the argument.
I would yes, if they agree, but I would probably avoid the az. As for kids are not at risk... I would say less likely too die, but not impossible.
4-Year-Old Texas Girl Dies of COVID After Unvaccinated Mom Contracts Virus: 'She Was Beautiful'
I am not sure, but I will say that the practicality of 12-15 is stupid, it should be 11-15 as they are going to go to schools to deliver it and if they start at 12 they will miss 1/2 of Year 7 (what we used to call 1st Year) which is crazy.
Under normal circumstances I would agree with you but the propaganda machine has been busy and people have allowed themselves to be programmed by their TV's for last 18 months and, like Boris, will be blind to the truth.If the JVCI have said not recommended and no benefit, I can't imagine many parents would allow their child to have the jab?
Under normal circumstances I would agree with you but the propaganda machine has been busy and people have allowed themselves to be programmed by their TV's for last 18 months and, like Boris, will be blind to the truth.
Perhaps, but not kids, which is what this thread is about.TVs are not the issue here. Social media, and the massive anti-vaxx disinformation propaganda are what are to blame for this. There are still people dying because they're refusing a vaccine as it hasn't been tested. We're living in a dystopian society, much like "I am Legend".
Perhaps, but not kids, which is what this thread is about.
And there are at least as many dying from the effects of the experimental jabs. So why take the chance?Well as those 12-15yrs olds wouldn't be able to make that decision, then my point is still absolutley valid. And there are cases of children dying from Covid.
What?And there are at least as many dying from the effects of the experimental jabs. So why take the chance?
What?
Can you elaborate on your point, as I don't want to take an inference.
Are you saying that as many people are dying from taking the jab, as those that haven't?
Are you speaking specifically about children dying, or adults?
Can you provide sources for this information that you've alluded too?
Will you be quoting the 98% survival rate per chance...
And there are at least as many dying from the effects of the experimental jabs. So why take the chance?
And there are at least as many dying from the effects of the experimental jabs. So why take the chance?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.