I'm watching the Masters and Tiger Woods, obviously is one of the featured groups.
Twice now this same American commentator has said something along these lines. " If Tiger hadn't bogeyed the 5th and had made 3 relatively missed short putts, he could be 3 or 4 under and tied for the lead"
Doesn't the thick twat realise that if you apply that fuzzy logic to Woods then you have to apply it to the other 77 players
Twice now this same American commentator has said something along these lines. " If Tiger hadn't bogeyed the 5th and had made 3 relatively missed short putts, he could be 3 or 4 under and tied for the lead"
Doesn't the thick twat realise that if you apply that fuzzy logic to Woods then you have to apply it to the other 77 players