The Provider issue on this forum?

[crackerchalk]

Hi all
After reading the very few post in this sec
I have nad an idea and they dont happen often
Now ****... could mean anything which is why it is used even in news papers
But how about this
We have 3 regions so say call em 1,2,3
Using the words one, two, three sounds better
Now whom will be each no. one
well i suggest the one with most coverage of the UK
two being the next and so on

p.s
At the powers that be. Would this be allowed?
Or is this 2 close to the cliff, cos any idiot could work that out

 

[mikeeyb185]

they could work it out but still it wouldnt be admissable as evidence any way as it doesnt state any provider so it would be ok i should think so

 

[JimmyP]

we will not have any refrence to the firms at all
be it code slang or any form nothing
with any refrence to the cable companys

 

[crackerchalk]

we will not have any refrence to the firms at all
be it code slang or any form nothing
with any refrence to the cable companys

Well that ends this disscusion then LOL
Silly thing about it was that a letter from each word was in each provider
Not sure if i was allowed to say that though?

edit
just thought of something
My LOCATION do i need to edit it ?
If it stays i think rules maybe needed or is mine ok

 

[scottyboydfc]

Well that ends this disscusion then LOL
Silly thing about it was that a letter from each word was in each provider
Not sure if i was allowed to say that though?

edit
just thought of something
My LOCATION do i need to edit it ?
If it stays i think rules maybe needed or is mine ok

I think not being allowed to name providers is taking it one step too far.

I can understand why no hacking discussion is allowed, but the prohibited naming of cable providers is plain stupidity

 

[Jooooles]

theres very clever people on this forum im just glad to read and stick around
be glad at the help you get dont ask for more

 

[nozzer]

I can understand why no hacking discussion is allowed, but the prohibited naming of cable providers is plain stupidity

You may think so but prohibiting the naming of cable providers immediately stops most posts asking for keys etc for a specific provider.

 

[scottyboydfc]

You may think so but prohibiting the naming of cable providers immediately stops most posts asking for keys etc for a specific provider.

well all i can say is the filter is beatable, displayed by a certain moderator in the shoutbox of all places.

oh well never mind, its trivial, not worth arguing about

 

[JimmyP]

well all i can say is the filter is beatable, displayed by a certain moderator in the shoutbox of all places.

oh well never mind, its trivial, not worth arguing about

do u have a problem with the rules of this site?

 

[scottyboydfc]

oh well never mind, its trivial, not worth arguing about

do u have a problem with the rules of this site?

please read my above quote

And if you don't mind me asking, why is it ok for moderators to use "the naughty words" but not members?

 

[JimmyP]

please read my above quote

And if you don't mind me asking, why is it ok for moderators to use "the naughty words" but not members?

who and when?

 

[scottyboydfc]

who and when?

No I won't go there thanks, the mod is a good friend of mine, wouldn't do that to him.

Just thought I'd let u know it goes on

 

[gooner71]

This thread seems to be descending into the same mess that others have already? Surely all members should just accept the rules and carry on posting or not? Its not too tough to get your point across in a roundabout sort of way without referencing specifics.

Im sure if there was a choice in the matter then it would be a free for all - but its just not worth the risk - why should anyone put their liberty at risk for the sake of TV?

 

[derekwd]

This thread seems to be descending into the same mess that others have already? Surely all members should just accept the rules and carry on posting or not? Its not too tough to get your point across in a roundabout sort of way without referencing specifics.

Im sure if there was a choice in the matter then it would be a free for all - but its just not worth the risk - why should anyone put their liberty at risk for the sake of TV?

Well said m8 i agree 100%

Derek

 

[crackerchalk]

This thread seems to be descending into the same mess that others have already? Surely all members should just accept the rules and carry on posting or not? Its not too tough to get your point across in a roundabout sort of way without referencing specifics.

Im sure if there was a choice in the matter then it would be a free for all - but its just not worth the risk - why should anyone put their liberty at risk for the sake of TV?

Hi all agiain
HERE HERE!!!!!
What have i started LOL
And i thought this would end at post 3/4 with the answers there
But i didnt get an answer on the "location" thing
Is mine allowed or not?
Cos this is a dead givaway to which prov... you are if you wish

Edit
Are we allowed to mention the 2 places Bromley & Langley
I will remove edit if not allowed