• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

The Provider issue on this forum?

crackerchalk

DW Member ++
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,931
Likes
41
#1
Hi all
After reading the very few post in this sec
I have nad an idea and they dont happen often
Now ****... could mean anything which is why it is used even in news papers
But how about this
We have 3 regions so say call em 1,2,3
Using the words one, two, three sounds better
Now whom will be each no. one
well i suggest the one with most coverage of the UK
two being the next and so on

p.s
At the powers that be. Would this be allowed?
Or is this 2 close to the cliff, cos any idiot could work that out
 

mikeeyb185

Inactive User
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
643
Likes
6
#2
they could work it out but still it wouldnt be admissable as evidence any way as it doesnt state any provider so it would be ok i should think so
 

JimmyP

VIP Member
VIP Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
5,895
Likes
39
#3
we will not have any refrence to the firms at all
be it code slang or any form nothing
with any refrence to the cable companys
 

crackerchalk

DW Member ++
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,931
Likes
41
#4
we will not have any refrence to the firms at all
be it code slang or any form nothing
with any refrence to the cable companys
Well that ends this disscusion then LOL
Silly thing about it was that a letter from each word was in each provider
Not sure if i was allowed to say that though?

edit
just thought of something
My LOCATION do i need to edit it ?
If it stays i think rules maybe needed or is mine ok
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
663
Likes
5
#5
Well that ends this disscusion then LOL
Silly thing about it was that a letter from each word was in each provider
Not sure if i was allowed to say that though?

edit
just thought of something
My LOCATION do i need to edit it ?
If it stays i think rules maybe needed or is mine ok
I think not being allowed to name providers is taking it one step too far.

I can understand why no hacking discussion is allowed, but the prohibited naming of cable providers is plain stupidity
 

Jooooles

Inactive User
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
6,326
Likes
66
#6
theres very clever people on this forum im just glad to read and stick around
be glad at the help you get dont ask for more
 
Last edited:

nozzer

VIP Member
VIP Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
6,662
Likes
72
#7
I can understand why no hacking discussion is allowed, but the prohibited naming of cable providers is plain stupidity
You may think so but prohibiting the naming of cable providers immediately stops most posts asking for keys etc for a specific provider.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
663
Likes
5
#8
You may think so but prohibiting the naming of cable providers immediately stops most posts asking for keys etc for a specific provider.
well all i can say is the filter is beatable, displayed by a certain moderator in the shoutbox of all places.

oh well never mind, its trivial, not worth arguing about
 

JimmyP

VIP Member
VIP Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
5,895
Likes
39
#9
well all i can say is the filter is beatable, displayed by a certain moderator in the shoutbox of all places.

oh well never mind, its trivial, not worth arguing about
do u have a problem with the rules of this site?
 

gooner71

VIP Member
VIP Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,911
Likes
24
#13
This thread seems to be descending into the same mess that others have already? Surely all members should just accept the rules and carry on posting or not? Its not too tough to get your point across in a roundabout sort of way without referencing specifics.

Im sure if there was a choice in the matter then it would be a free for all - but its just not worth the risk - why should anyone put their liberty at risk for the sake of TV?
 

derekwd

Inactive User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Messages
927
Likes
2
#14
This thread seems to be descending into the same mess that others have already? Surely all members should just accept the rules and carry on posting or not? Its not too tough to get your point across in a roundabout sort of way without referencing specifics.

Im sure if there was a choice in the matter then it would be a free for all - but its just not worth the risk - why should anyone put their liberty at risk for the sake of TV?
Well said m8 i agree 100%

Derek
 

crackerchalk

DW Member ++
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,931
Likes
41
#15
This thread seems to be descending into the same mess that others have already? Surely all members should just accept the rules and carry on posting or not? Its not too tough to get your point across in a roundabout sort of way without referencing specifics.

Im sure if there was a choice in the matter then it would be a free for all - but its just not worth the risk - why should anyone put their liberty at risk for the sake of TV?
Hi all agiain
HERE HERE!!!!!
What have i started LOL
And i thought this would end at post 3/4 with the answers there
But i didnt get an answer on the "location" thing
Is mine allowed or not?
Cos this is a dead givaway to which prov... you are if you wish

Edit
Are we allowed to mention the 2 places Bromley & Langley
I will remove edit if not allowed
 
Last edited: