- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,413
- Reaction score
- 7,025
He has took advise and added all the medical evidence to the mandatory re-consideration form.
The truth is, she answered questions that were never asked and some incorrect. She actually missed off her report the main disability. The same illness he has had for years and the same illness that was reported in 3 previous DWP reports from years gone by.
This was discussed at length in his interview but for some unknown reason she failed to even mention this but in previous medicals for the DWP it is listed as his main disability.
The interviewer then so called did a medical. In her report she lied. She claims she did certain examinations and reports certain examinations as "normal" most she never actually did, the sister in law is his witness.
The problem is there is, 4 other previous DWP medicals spotted things, the same things that can never get better and remain the same so her medical can simply be discredited along with a letter of support they have acquired from their GP.
Its not so much about proving she lied it's about proving his condition is actually worse and can do even less with strong medical evidence that discredits her medical and makes her interview a farce and flawed from top to toe. Tbh this isn't hard to do and this woman should be struck off from doing previous interviews.
I can't go into depth but if you cant simple medical examinations correctly and write those findings then you shouldn't be fit to do the job.
The truth is, she answered questions that were never asked and some incorrect. She actually missed off her report the main disability. The same illness he has had for years and the same illness that was reported in 3 previous DWP reports from years gone by.
This was discussed at length in his interview but for some unknown reason she failed to even mention this but in previous medicals for the DWP it is listed as his main disability.
The interviewer then so called did a medical. In her report she lied. She claims she did certain examinations and reports certain examinations as "normal" most she never actually did, the sister in law is his witness.
The problem is there is, 4 other previous DWP medicals spotted things, the same things that can never get better and remain the same so her medical can simply be discredited along with a letter of support they have acquired from their GP.
Its not so much about proving she lied it's about proving his condition is actually worse and can do even less with strong medical evidence that discredits her medical and makes her interview a farce and flawed from top to toe. Tbh this isn't hard to do and this woman should be struck off from doing previous interviews.
I can't go into depth but if you cant simple medical examinations correctly and write those findings then you shouldn't be fit to do the job.