Pedophilia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yawn Yawn
By the way do you drive a Fiat?

Ok lets drag the debate down to your level you fooken low life moron.
What the fook does it matter what i drive.
Its pricks like you that spoil threads and end up getting them removed or closed by mods.
Ok done with the moronic insulting bit so i will leave your level of intelect now you dumb fook.
 
Hmmm I dont nessasarily agree with corinadeva views but he does have a point. The original post was about lynch mobs and paedo's. To bring speeding stats and gatso stats into this debate seems pointless.

There are many issues we could discuss like the introduction of Megans law into the UK or
Tagging every single convicted paedo or
even chopping their weeners off like in Saudi if convicted of a sexual crime or
how about discussing how many children are actually molested and not killed. I'm sure this figure would be pretty high even considering the number of parents that would actually report it. Maybe this figure would be high enough to match some traffic stats.....

Did you know that more children are killed by....
 
Hmmm I dont nessasarily agree with corinadeva views but he does have a point. The original post was about lynch mobs and paedo's. To bring speeding stats and gatso stats into this debate seems pointless.

There are many issues we could discuss like the introduction of Megans law into the UK or
Tagging every single convicted paedo or
even chopping their weeners off like in Saudi if convicted of a sexual crime or
how about discussing how many children are actually molested and not killed. I'm sure this figure would be pretty high even considering the number of parents that would actually report it. Maybe this figure would be high enough to match some traffic stats.....

Did you know that more children are killed by....

Yep i agree with what you are saying and its sensibly put. If Corinadeva had had the intelligence to put it like that then i dont think he would have had an arguement.

We live in a society that is protected by laws. If the law is not protecting us then it needs to be changed. not taken into our own hands. I would favour a law that says any convicted pedo be chemicaly castrated. I would also have them tagged for life.
 
Ok lets drag the debate down to your level you fooken low life moron.
What the fook does it matter what i drive.
Its pricks like you that spoil threads and end up getting them removed or closed by mods.
Ok done with the moronic insulting bit so i will leave your level of intelect now you dumb fook.

Talking of monkeys a simple yes or no would have sufficed
p.s Sticks and stones
 
I would favour a law that says any convicted pedo be chemicaly castrated. I would also have them tagged for life.

Hi Peeps. Some interesting views here. My missus used to work with sex offenders (Mental health nurse) and they are chemically castrated. Only problem is that they can do as much damage by being chemically castrated. Unfortunatley the sex offender will end up more violent and kill the child through frustration at not being able to get sexually aroused? This is a very sad but true fact.

PS: Chemical castration is temporary, the offender has to be injected with the drug on a regular basis.

I am a father and would also favour the death penalty for convicted paedophiles.
 
Last edited:
put all paedophiles on death row get rid of them

there is no easy reply to this let say we did bring back death row and we killed someone then 10 years or so later ,we find out he did not do it ,,would that make us as bad as the paedopiles as we just killed someone son ??

you might say with dna and all the new tools we have now we would not make this cock up but what new thing are there going to be here in 10 years time that we say oh wait that man we killed back then oh shit this new tool just shows 100% that he did not do it

but then locking them up is not the key to it as we are running out of room so as i said this is not a easy thing to sort out
 
Hi Peeps. Some interesting views here. My missus used to work with sex offenders (Mental health nurse) and they are chemically castrated. Only problem is that they can do as much damage by being chemically castrated. Unfortunatley the sex offender will end up more violent and kill the child through frustration at not being able to get sexually aroused? This is a very sad but true fact.

PS: Chemical castration is temporary, the offender has to be injected with the drug on a regular basis.

I am a father amd would also favour the dearth penalty for convicted paedophiles.

Very intresting post m8 i never thought of it like that.
The death penalty is punishment for after the event.
In my view it would not deter these people who are obviously sick in the head so its back to square one.
Im not against the idea of executing convicted pedos but as i said its prevention thats needed first and foremost.
 
As much as i hate to say it I am against the death penalty no matter what the crime, and yes I am a parent. What about all those people who were wurongly convicted? What do we say to those people, oops soory we killded yo?
 
The death penalty is punishment for after the event.
In my view it would not deter these people who are obviously sick in the head so its back to square one.
Im not against the idea of executing convicted pedos but as i said its prevention thats needed first and foremost.

I agree mate. I would support the death penatly only for proven convictions as they are sick people that can't help but re-offened? How do you address the current problem? I don't know the answer to that, what I do know is that the sex offenders register is short of actual numbers? It's scary the offenders that aren't on it.

It seems to have got a lot worse in recent years. When I was a kid, during the summer holidays, me and my mates used to leave house in the morning and go and play until teatime. My Mum and Dad thought nothing of it? I can't let my daughter out of sight, with fear of someone taking her away.
 
Last edited:
"sensible debate" corinadeva wouldn't know what one of those is :)
 
name and shame every person on the sex offenders register is something that can be done put it in the papers make sure that they are not given houses near schools and parks. Some pedos are woman as well its not only men that sexually abuse children .there are more children sexually abused by their own family than a stranger.Put them in the same room with the family of the child they have assaluted.
 
I'm not sure that things are any worse than they used to be. I'm 57 and I encountered quite a few "strange" men when I was a child.


There is another problem with the vigilante approach: the sex offender label is spread rather wide and includes, among others, young men who have had sex with under-aged girls just a little younger than themselves - people taking the law into their own hands are likely to make wrong and dangerous judgements.
 
what hamba has said is a good point, a young guy who has just turned 17 could be classed as a sex offender for sleeping with a girl who is nearly 16, even though there may only be 14 months age difference and she may be a lot more mature than him, but in the eyes of the law he would be a sex offender
 
what hamba has said is a good point, a young guy who has just turned 17 could be classed as a sex offender for sleeping with a girl who is nearly 16, even though there may only be 14 months age difference and she may be a lot more mature than him, but in the eyes of the law he would be a sex offender

Yep, It's a very thin line?
 
A pedophile is a person, most frequently a man, who focuses his sexual fantasies and behavior toward children. People who enjoy child pornography are pedophiles.
Debate points
:1 The protection of children from dangerous pedophiles
:2 More money going into monitoring and tagging paedophiles, not into treatment centres
:3 Community Notification
:4 Lenient sentences for pedophile
Do you see this "no" we see some self proclaimed Intellectual member of the P.C brigade come up with SPEEDING

(The offence of exceeding the speed limit ) and all his little Disciple's shouting "what about the motorist" (debate LMAO)
 
A pedophile is a person, most frequently a man, who focuses his sexual fantasies and behavior toward children. People who enjoy child pornography are pedophiles.
Debate points
:1 The protection of children from dangerous pedophiles
:2 More money going into monitoring and tagging paedophiles, not into treatment centres
:3 Community Notification
:4 Lenient sentences for pedophile
Do you see this "no" we see some self proclaimed Intellectual member of the P.C brigade come up with SPEEDING

(The offence of exceeding the speed limit ) and all his little Disciple's shouting "what about the motorist" (debate LMAO)


It's easy to jump on bandwagons and get all worked up about emotive subjects.

I think Narabdela was making the point that more children are killed/harmed as the result of speeding than by the actions of paedophiles.

We can rant against paedophiles because there is no cost to us, but tackling speeding requires each of us to slow down. Setting out ten minutes earlier for a meeting is a small price to pay to save lives, but we find it increasingly intolerable. We put our individual needs above the collective every time."

This doesn't condon the actions of paedophiles but questions the ranting.
 
everyone can quote statistics but children hurt or killed in accidents are just that
accidentally injured never have i heard that some one intended to run over a child
i personally have never heard or expect to hear that a child was accidentally raped / abused or beaten
so how can there be a comparison between accident and intent there isn't
i do not condone lynch mobs but do believe that pedeos should be placed in an environment that ensures that they are monitored on a constant basis not tagging as this has been proved not to work or being placed on any register as this has been proved not to work either my personal advise would be to clear an island like say the isle of white or the isle of man then
nuke the barstewards
 
Last edited:
The intention to kill or injure a child - when ignoring the speed limit - may not be there but the intention to speed is there and therefore to ignore it is to risk injuring or killing someone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top