tm nano super

simon123456

Inactive User
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
443
Reaction score
25
so far so good been playing around with the receiver the last couple of days very good receiver so far ill let u guys no its very fast and for the prise its value for money
regards simon

this is a very good receiver

I will when iv the time regards simon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Give us an in depth write up, and why with your beta testing skills you believe it to be so good.
You can compare it to the many other stb's you own and state the pros and cons.
Thanks.
 
Give us an in depth write up, and why with your beta testing skills you believe it to be so good.
You can compare it to the many other stb's you own and state the pros and cons.
Thanks.

No, pleeeese! Extracting the michael like this may result in copious encrypted prose, which even Google Translate struggles with. Best to reserve the receiver reviews to reserved reviewers. I think..... :bangshead:
 
@simon123456
Hi mate what boxes do you have,I have at present a new vu solo se and a cloud ibox 2.I have had in the past loads of boxes..from vu duo 2 a solo 2 plus a gigablue quad and some dreamboxs as well..also a miriclebox and technomate nano oe and lots more..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello there.!

I would like to get deep analysis about nano2 super.
I have been usin several boxes, PCI cards, USB tuners etc
At top of my house there is 180 prime (now with c-band lnb, motorised 30w-50e, 110 offset USALS motor 40w-85E)
Currently using Azbox premium(not plus model, one of the first series) and DR HD F15.
Would like to get FAST box with sensitive tuner, Linux. Which allows feed hunting too. And with hardware without need for soldering iron / bad power supplies.


Would some one with ability to write more than one line be so generous that he/she would put here some deeper analysis?:proud:
 
Running Broadcom's latest CPU, the 1.3Ghz lightning processor is 3x faster than the previous generation, making booting, channel changing and applications run a lot quicker!

With the TM-Nano 2 Super, you can watch satellite channels in glorious High-Definition (HD), Full HD 1080p with Dolby Digital Plus to give you a superior audio experience. It’s also True 3D ready ensuring compatibility with future 3D formats.

It is an Open Embedded satellite receiver which has access to plenty of Third Party applications giving you a lot more features and plugins than a standard satellite receiver.

Want to know what's happening on another channel at the same time? Now you can. With HD Picture-In-Picture (PIP), you can view 2 HD channels at the same time!

The Gigabit Ethernet Port allows data to transfer up to 10x faster than standard Ethernet Ports allowing faster streaming, file transfers, downloading/uploading...and more!

Not leaving the Standard Definition (SD) channels behind, we’ve developed a built-in hardware Upscaler to improve the picture quality of Standard Definition (SD) channels via the HDMI output.

You can use a USB Hard Disk Drive (HDD) or an internal 2.5" Hard Disk Drive to record all your favourite channels, listen to your music and watch a slideshow of your photos.

The silent temperature and speed controlled fan cools the TM-Nano 2 Super only when needed and the speed level can also be adjusted.

It’s even Eco-friendly with 1W standby power consumption.

System:
Video Decoder:
MPEG-2, MPEG-4 HD, H.264, PAL, NTSC
Audio Decoder:
MPEG-1/2, Dolby Digital Plus AC3 Audio
Tuner:
2x DVB-S2
High-Definition HD:
1080p, 1080i, 720p, 576p, 576i
CPU:
1300MHz
SDRAM / Flash:
1024Mbytes / 256Mbytes
Front:
Front Display:
X
Front USB:
1
Smart Card Reader:
1
Common Interface (CI) Slot:
X
Rear:
Video Interface:
HDMI, RCA
Audio Interface:
Optical S/PDIF
Ethernet Interface:
10/100Mbps
Rear USB:
2x USB 2.0
RF Modulator:
X
Internal SATA Support:
O
Fan:
Temperature & Speed Controlled
Power Supply:
Input Voltage:
AC 100~240V, 50/60Hz
Standby Consumption:
Under 1Watt
Others:
Size (WxHxD):
270x55x190 (mm)
Weight:
2.0 Kg
 
All the above is just copy paste sales advertisement.

I am deeply sorry to write this , but when asking deep analysis and experiences about something I am expecting real value info, not copy paste advertisement from some one with apparently very limited reading comprehension.

PLEASE some one who has tested the box with weak satellite signal , fringe reception conditions, give a report.


Feedme with info

Well at least I took the time and put something down to try and help you.
Why be so demanding and ungrateful you do not deserve help from others when using that tone.
 
Well at least I took the time and put something down to try and help you.
Why be so demanding and ungrateful you do not deserve help from others when using that tone.
His username says it all !:)
 
These are the channels it found when I scanned.

Not too clued up on on the other thing, so could not test for you. They came up as "service invalid. Time out reading pmt".
 

Attachments

  • 27.5w TMN2S.rar
    29.1 KB · Views: 6
anyone knows how good are tuners of that receiver compared to competitive to Vu solo2 or
your previous box
 
anyone knows how good are tuners of that receiver compared to competitive to Vu solo2 or
your previous box

Tuners are good, i have never had any issues and they perform the same as all my VU+boxes,
 
the question Is however how good are they
If their sensitivity Is on par with solo2 they are really good because solo2 got best tuners from all Vu boxes
 
the question Is however how good are they
If their sensitivity Is on par with solo2 they are really good because solo2 got best tuners from all Vu boxes

Technomate are know for super sensitive tuners..as I posted before,on my technomate they perform just as well or same as my VU+ boxes.
 
Back
Top